BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30627150)

  • 1. Methods to Compare Predicted and Observed Phosphene Experience in tACS Subjects.
    Indahlastari A; Kasinadhuni AK; Saar C; Castellano K; Mousa B; Chauhan M; Mareci TH; Sadleir RJ
    Neural Plast; 2018; 2018():8525706. PubMed ID: 30627150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retinal and Cortical Contributions to Phosphenes During Transcranial Electrical Current Stimulation.
    Evans ID; Palmisano S; Croft RJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2021 Feb; 42(2):146-158. PubMed ID: 33440463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-dependent and montage-based differences in phosphene perception thresholds via transcranial alternating current stimulation.
    Evans ID; Palmisano S; Loughran SP; Legros A; Croft RJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2019 Sep; 40(6):365-374. PubMed ID: 31338856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phosphene Attributes Depend on Frequency and Intensity of Retinal tACS.
    Kvašňák E; Orendáčová M; Vránová J
    Physiol Res; 2022 Aug; 71(4):561-571. PubMed ID: 35770470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds.
    Kanai R; Paulus W; Walsh V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1551-1554. PubMed ID: 20382069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retinal origin of phosphenes to transcranial alternating current stimulation.
    Schutter DJ; Hortensius R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 121(7):1080-4. PubMed ID: 20188625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplitude modulating frequency overrides carrier frequency in tACS-induced phosphene percept.
    Hsu CY; Liu TL; Lee DH; Yeh DR; Chen YH; Liang WK; Juan CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Feb; 44(3):914-926. PubMed ID: 36250439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-TACS) efficacy evaluation via phosphene induction.
    Thiele C; Zaehle T; Haghikia A; Ruhnau P
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22245. PubMed ID: 34782626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes.
    Laakso I; Hirata A
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Aug; 10(4):046009. PubMed ID: 23813466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Kammer T; Beck S; Erb M; Grodd W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 112(11):2015-21. PubMed ID: 11682339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing the montage for cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): a combined computational and experimental study.
    Sadeghihassanabadi F; Misselhorn J; Gerloff C; Zittel S
    J Neural Eng; 2022 May; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35421852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating Current Density Modeling of Non-Invasive Eye and Brain Electrical Stimulation Using Phosphene Thresholds.
    Sabel BA; Kresinsky A; Cardenas-Morales L; Haueisen J; Hunold A; Dannhauer M; Antal A
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():2133-2141. PubMed ID: 34648453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurosensory effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.
    Raco V; Bauer R; Olenik M; Brkic D; Gharabaghi A
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(6):823-31. PubMed ID: 25442154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation.
    Turi Z; Ambrus GG; Janacsek K; Emmert K; Hahn L; Paulus W; Antal A
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2013; 31(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 23478342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saturation in Phosphene Size with Increasing Current Levels Delivered to Human Visual Cortex.
    Bosking WH; Sun P; Ozker M; Pei X; Foster BL; Beauchamp MS; Yoshor D
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(30):7188-7197. PubMed ID: 28652411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct Oscillatory Frequencies Underlie Excitability of Human Occipital and Parietal Cortex.
    Samaha J; Gosseries O; Postle BR
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(11):2824-2833. PubMed ID: 28179556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cutaneous retinal activation and neural entrainment in transcranial alternating current stimulation: A systematic review.
    Schutter DJ
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():83-8. PubMed ID: 26453929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Migraine-linked characteristics of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced phosphenes.
    Ekkert A; Noreikaitė K; Valiulis V; Ryliškienė K
    J Integr Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 18(4):463-466. PubMed ID: 31912706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy.
    Kasinadhuni AK; Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schär M; Mareci TH; Sadleir RJ
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):764-772. PubMed ID: 28457836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel approach for documenting phosphenes induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Elkin-Frankston S; Fried PJ; Pascual-Leone A; Rushmore RJ; Valero-Cabr A
    J Vis Exp; 2010 Apr; (38):. PubMed ID: 20360672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.