BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30627801)

  • 1. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection.
    Abdel-Basset M; Manogaran G; Gamal A; Smarandache F
    J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):38. PubMed ID: 30627801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains.
    Chen J; Zeng S; Zhang C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 29986549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada.
    El Allaki F; Christensen J; Vallières A
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Apr; 165():36-43. PubMed ID: 30851926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
    Chung ES; Kim Y
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-criteria decision making based on induced generalized interval neutrosophic Choquet integral.
    Jiao Y; Wang L; Liu J; Ma G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242449. PubMed ID: 33259510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
    Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health-Care Waste Treatment Technology Selection Using the Interval 2-Tuple Induced TOPSIS Method.
    Lu C; You JX; Liu HC; Li P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27271652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
    Chen CH
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.
    Zhong S; Zhang J; He X; Liu S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271194. PubMed ID: 36137146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.
    Liu F; Zhang WG
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1283-94. PubMed ID: 24081882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A supplier selection model in pharmaceutical supply chain using PCA, Z-TOPSIS and MILP: A case study.
    Forghani A; Sadjadi SJ; Farhang Moghadam B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201604. PubMed ID: 30110349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Novel Integration of IF-DEMATEL and TOPSIS for the Classifier Selection Problem in Assistive Technology Adoption for People with Dementia.
    Ortíz-Barrios MA; Garcia-Constantino M; Nugent C; Alfaro-Sarmiento I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
    Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some linguistic neutrosophic Hamy mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making.
    Liu P; You X
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193027. PubMed ID: 29513697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():601. PubMed ID: 27247897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integrated fuzzy approach for strategic alliance partner selection in third-party logistics.
    Erkayman B; Gundogar E; Yilmaz A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():486306. PubMed ID: 23365520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
    Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.