These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30628034)

  • 1. Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality.
    Wesslein AK; Moeller B; Frings C; Giesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 30628034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating distractor inhibition and episodic retrieval processes in children: No evidence for developmental deficits.
    Giesen C; Weissmann F; Rothermund K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():212-231. PubMed ID: 28946043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated.
    Frings C; Moeller B; Rothermund K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):700-9. PubMed ID: 23392625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loss of attentional inhibition in older adults--Does it really exist? An experimental dissociation of inhibitory and memory retrieval processes.
    Giesen C; Eberhard M; Rothermund K
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Jun; 30(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 25961880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality.
    Wesslein AK; Frings C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Aug; 33(7):703-721. PubMed ID: 32101789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
    Frings C; Amendt A; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1174-81. PubMed ID: 21553991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 30173278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
    Moeller B; Schächinger H; Frings C
    J Vis Exp; 2014 May; (87):. PubMed ID: 24893586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 214(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 21822951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. You can't ignore what you can't separate: the effect of visually induced target-distractor separation on tactile selection.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 25316048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From hands to feet: Abstract response representations in distractor-response bindings.
    Moeller B; Hommel B; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():69-75. PubMed ID: 26047973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disentangling inhibition-based and retrieval-based aftereffects of distractors: Cognitive versus motor processes.
    Singh T; Laub R; Burgard JP; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):797-805. PubMed ID: 29154633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 31343245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates of attentional selection in tactile search tasks: The impact of singleton distractors on target selection.
    Mena CI; Lang K; Gherri E
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13592. PubMed ID: 32412112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension.
    Mast F; Frings C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2325-36. PubMed ID: 24728130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.