These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. Dissociative prime-probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: a challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account of negative priming. Wong KF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1411-22. PubMed ID: 11185773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of spatial response coding on distractor processing: evidence from auditory spatial negative priming tasks with keypress, joystick, and head movement responses. Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):293-310. PubMed ID: 25214304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes. Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions. Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 15460924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Levels of visuo-spatial selection: an ERP study of negative priming. Gibbons H; Wiegleb N; Stahl J Brain Cogn; 2013 Nov; 83(2):203-17. PubMed ID: 24056236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inhibited prime-trial distractor responses solely produce the visual spatial negative priming effect. Buckolz E; Edgar C; Kajaste B; Lok M; Khan M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1632-43. PubMed ID: 22961718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes. Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cross-modal attention modulates tactile subitizing but not tactile numerosity estimation. Tian Y; Chen L Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 29549663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings. Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction. Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]