These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30628034)

  • 21. Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():57-64. PubMed ID: 27665268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual-tactile selective attention in autism spectrum condition: An increased influence of visual distractors.
    Poole D; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 29963887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets.
    Frings C; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Oct; 60(10):1367-77. PubMed ID: 17853245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Principles of tactile search over the body.
    Halfen EJ; Magnotti JF; Rahman MS; Yau JM
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 May; 123(5):1955-1968. PubMed ID: 32233886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The official soundtrack to "Five shades of grey": Generalization in multimodal distractor-based retrieval.
    Schöpper LM; Singh T; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3479-3489. PubMed ID: 32533525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.
    Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictability reduces event file retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Hommel B; Münchau A; Beste C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1073-1087. PubMed ID: 36577916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dissociative prime-probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: a challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account of negative priming.
    Wong KF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1411-22. PubMed ID: 11185773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of spatial response coding on distractor processing: evidence from auditory spatial negative priming tasks with keypress, joystick, and head movement responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):293-310. PubMed ID: 25214304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 15460924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Levels of visuo-spatial selection: an ERP study of negative priming.
    Gibbons H; Wiegleb N; Stahl J
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Nov; 83(2):203-17. PubMed ID: 24056236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inhibited prime-trial distractor responses solely produce the visual spatial negative priming effect.
    Buckolz E; Edgar C; Kajaste B; Lok M; Khan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1632-43. PubMed ID: 22961718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-modal attention modulates tactile subitizing but not tactile numerosity estimation.
    Tian Y; Chen L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 29549663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distractor inhibition: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials.
    Pramme L; Dierolf AM; Naumann E; Frings C
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Aug; 98():74-81. PubMed ID: 26114922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory negative priming endures response modality change; prime response retrieval does not.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):653-65. PubMed ID: 19626576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.