478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30628079)
1. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation and experimental validation of a robust hybrid direct aperture optimization approach for mixed-beam radiotherapy.
Heath E; Mueller S; Guyer G; Duetschler A; Elicin O; Aebersold D; Fix MK; Manser P
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7299-7312. PubMed ID: 34585756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization using the column generation approach.
Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4287-4298. PubMed ID: 28500783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy planning for soft tissue sarcoma.
Heng VJ; Serban M; Renaud MA; Freeman C; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6502-6513. PubMed ID: 37681990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
An Y; Liang J; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28044325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of Photon Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Robustness in Patients With Prostate Cancer as a Proposed Benchmark for Proton Therapy Robustness Evaluation.
Maas JA; McDonald AM; Cardan RA; Snider JW; Fiveash JB; Kole AJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 37748679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous optimization of photons and electrons for mixed beam radiotherapy.
Mueller S; Fix MK; Joosten A; Henzen D; Frei D; Volken W; Kueng R; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5840-5860. PubMed ID: 28467321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation.
Korevaar EW; Habraken SJM; Scandurra D; Kierkels RGJ; Unipan M; Eenink MGC; Steenbakkers RJHM; Peeters SG; Zindler JD; Hoogeman M; Langendijk JA
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Dec; 141():267-274. PubMed ID: 31492443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance for mixed electron-photon beam radiation therapy using treatment log files and MapCHECK.
Tai YM; Heng VJ; Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7996-8008. PubMed ID: 37782074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
Liu W; Zhang X; Li Y; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1079-91. PubMed ID: 22320818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid proton-photon inverse optimization with uniformity-regularized proton and photon target dose.
Gao H
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105003. PubMed ID: 30978714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
