478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30628516)
1. Intrauterine device continuation rates and reasons for discontinuation in a Central European clinic with a high standard of care and ultrasound follow-up: a retrospective cohort study.
Bachofner M; Blickenstorfer K; Hutmacher J; Wehrle L; Leeners B; Merki-Feld G
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Dec; 23(6):407-414. PubMed ID: 30628516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
French R; Van Vliet H; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Helmerhorst F; Guillebaud J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(3):CD001776. PubMed ID: 15266453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pregnancy outcomes associated with extended use of the 52-mg 20 μg/day levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system beyond 60 months: A chart review of 776 women in Brazil.
Bahamondes L; Fernandes A; Bahamondes MV; Juliato CT; Ali M; Monteiro I
Contraception; 2018 Mar; 97(3):205-209. PubMed ID: 29055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
French R; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Guillebaud J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001776. PubMed ID: 11406007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two cohorts of women who expulsed either a copper-intrauterine device or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Simonatto P; Bahamondes MV; Fernandes A; Silveira C; Bahamondes L
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 May; 42(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 26817571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices.
Diedrich JT; Madden T; Zhao Q; Peipert JF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):822.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26409157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.
Modesto W; Bahamondes MV; Bahamondes L
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 24812309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system compared to copper intrauterine device: a population-based cohort study.
Bosco-Lévy P; Gouverneur A; Langlade C; Miremont G; Pariente A
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):345-349. PubMed ID: 30871933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selection and performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Lähteenmäki P; Bardin CW; Elomaa K; Haukkamaa M; Kivijärvi A; Kuukankorpi A; Venhola M; Tuominen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 164():69-74. PubMed ID: 9225643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bleeding pattern difference between levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine devices inserted immediately post-abortion: a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in Chinese women.
Chen X; Li Q; Wang X; Chen J; Lv W; Shi B; Wang H; Luo J; Li J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 May; 34(5):873-880. PubMed ID: 29298525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in continuation rates and early removal between contraceptive and therapeutic use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system 52 mg.
Teunissen AM; Merry AHH; Devies IEC; Roumen FJME
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Dec; 24(6):449-456. PubMed ID: 31696740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Free-of-charge long-acting reversible contraception: two-year discontinuation, its risk factors, and reasons.
Saloranta TH; Gyllenberg FK; But A; Gissler M; Laine MK; Heikinheimo O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):886.e1-886.e17. PubMed ID: 32562657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detailed analysis of menstrual bleeding patterns after postmenstrual and postabortal insertion of a copper IUD or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Suvisaari J; Lähteenmäki P
Contraception; 1996 Oct; 54(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 8922872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative Risk of Cervical Neoplasms Among Copper and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users.
Spotnitz ME; Natarajan K; Ryan PB; Westhoff CL
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 135(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 31923062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of a 5-year contraceptive trial in parous and nulliparous women with a new LNG-IUS.
Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Jackers G
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2017 Mar; 33(3):223-226. PubMed ID: 28084114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception.
Bilgehan F; Dilbaz B; Karadag B; Deveci CD
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1426-32. PubMed ID: 26180028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
