These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30628532)

  • 1. Quality evaluation of the emergency program of three contemporary cell-washing machines.
    De Somer F; Bernolet H; Bouchez S; Bové T
    Perfusion; 2019 May; 34(4):318-322. PubMed ID: 30628532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of bowl size, program setup, and blood hematocrit on the performance of a discontinuous autotransfusion system.
    Seyfried TF; Gruber M; Streithoff F; Mandle RJ; Pawlik MT; Busse H; Hansen E
    Transfusion; 2017 Mar; 57(3):589-598. PubMed ID: 28233319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the minimum volume of salvage blood required for the successful use of two different autotransfusion devices.
    Baumann C; Lamesic G; Weiss M; Cushing MM; Haas T
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Mar; 25(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 25267461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quick biochemical markers for assessment of quality control of intraoperative cell salvage: a prospective observational study.
    Dong P; Che J; Li X; Tian M; Smith FG
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 9():86. PubMed ID: 24886505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing of small volumes in blood salvage devices.
    Seyfried T; Breu A; Gruber M; Reipert J; Hansen E
    Transfusion; 2014 Oct; 54(10 Pt 2):2775-81. PubMed ID: 24953124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial bowls using the Haemonetics Cell Saver 5: does it produce a quality product?
    Serrick CJ; Scholz M
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2005 Jun; 37(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 16117453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In Vitro Evaluation of the Fresenius Kabi CATSmart Autotransfusion System.
    Alberts M; Groom RC; Walczak R; Kramer R; Karpiel A; Dieter J; Sheth L; Greene NH; Jooste EH
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2017 Jun; 49(2):107-111. PubMed ID: 28638159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Washing of banked blood by three different blood salvage devices.
    Gruber M; Breu A; Frauendorf M; Seyfried T; Hansen E
    Transfusion; 2013 May; 53(5):1001-9. PubMed ID: 22897672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of three autotransfusion devices for utilization in the pediatric population.
    Melchior RW; Dreher M; Shade B; Chappell A; Fisher D; Rosenthal T
    Perfusion; 2021 Jan; 36(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 32475210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fat removal during cell salvage: an optimized program for a discontinuous autotransfusion device.
    Seyfried TF; Gruber M; Breu A; Aumeier C; Zech N; Hansen E
    Transfusion; 2016 Jan; 56(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 26331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Haemonetics Cell Saver 5 washing properties: effect of different washing pump and centrifuge speeds.
    Naumenko KS; Kim SF; Cherkanova MS; Naumenko SE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Oct; 7(5):759-63. PubMed ID: 18635585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Optimal Cell Salvage Settings to Maximize Hematocrit and Minimize Potassium Using the Cobe BRAT2 Autologous Blood Recovery Unit.
    Smith NK; Kim SJ; Simmons Q; Lin HM; Romano D; Boydston E; DeMaria S; Zerillo J
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2022 Jul; 36(7):1893-1900. PubMed ID: 34446326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of processed blood for autotransfusion.
    Shulman G
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2000 Mar; 32(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10947618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effects of three cell saver devices on erythrocyte function during cardiopulmonary bypass procedure--a pilot study.
    Wang X; Ji B; Zhang Y; Zhu X; Liu J; Long C; Zheng Z
    Artif Organs; 2012 Oct; 36(10):931-5. PubMed ID: 22835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative assessment of blood washing with the continuous autologous transfusion system (CATS).
    Walpoth BH; Eggensperger N; Walpoth-Aslan BN; Neidhart P; Lanz M; Zehnder R; Spaeth PJ; Kurt G; Althaus U
    Int J Artif Organs; 1997 Apr; 20(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 9195242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research in intraoperative blood salvage.
    Waters JH
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 10(4):248-9. PubMed ID: 22706485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Double RBC Collection by Blood Cell Separators.
    Kitpoka P; Chanthet S; Chongkolwatana V; Chuansumrit A; Kunakorn M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jan; 99(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27455830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative red cell salvage in head and neck surgery.
    Nusrath MA; Edge CJ; Ahmed-Nusrath A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 50(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 21708417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [MODERN TECHNOLOGIES OF THE SAVING OF PATIENT'S BLOOD AND REDUCTION OF THE USE OF DONOR BLOOD DURING OPERATIONS ON THE ASCENDING AORTA AND AORTIC ARCH].
    Trekova NA; Charchyan ER; Akselrod BA; Seleznev MN; Guskov DA; Solovyeva IN
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2015; 60(5):20-6. PubMed ID: 26852576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of red blood cells using autotransfusion devices: a comparative analysis.
    Serrick CJ; Scholz M; Melo A; Singh O; Noel D
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2003 Mar; 35(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 12680493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.