These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3062865)

  • 21. Statistics of boundaries in ultrasonic B-scan images.
    Shankar PM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):268-80. PubMed ID: 25438836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Imaging local scatterer concentrations by the Nakagami statistical model.
    Tsui PH; Chang CC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):608-19. PubMed ID: 17343979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scatterer-induced frequency variations in reflected acoustic pulses: implications for tissue characterization.
    Gehlbach SM; Sommer FG; Stern RA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Apr; 7(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 3909603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of frequency diversity and Nakagami statistics in ultrasonic tissue characterization.
    Dumane VA; Shankar PM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Jul; 48(4):1139-46. PubMed ID: 11477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the spectral fit algorithm as functions of frequency range and deltakaeff.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):2003-10. PubMed ID: 16422412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of transducer characteristics on the estimation of Nakagami paramater as a function of scatterer concentration.
    Tsui PH; Wang SH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1345-53. PubMed ID: 15582234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A method for determination of frequency-dependent effective scatterer number density.
    Chen JF; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 8120267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using phase information in ultrasonic backscatter for in vivo liver analysis.
    Molthen RC; Narayanan VM; Shankar PM; Reid JM; Genis V; Forsberg F; Halpern EJ; Goldberg BB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Jan; 24(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 9483774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Processing radio frequency ultrasound images: a robust method for local spectral features estimation by a spatially constrained parametric approach.
    Gorce JM; Friboulet D; Dydenko I; D'hooge J; Bijnens BH; Magnin IE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1704-19. PubMed ID: 12546150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eigenfunction analysis of stochastic backscatter for characterization of acoustic aberration in medical ultrasound imaging.
    Varslot T; Krogstad H; Mo E; Angelsen BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3068-76. PubMed ID: 15237831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ultrasonic tissue characterization via 2-D spectrum analysis: theory and in vitro measurements.
    Liu T; Lizzi FL; Ketterling JA; Silverman RH; Kutcher GJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 17441250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using the LMSE filters and the median filter.
    Jang HS; Lee MH; Park SB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 3347963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of Coherent and Diffuse Scattering Using a Reference Phantom.
    Rosado-Mendez IM; Drehfal LC; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1306-20. PubMed ID: 27046872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of Homodyned K Distribution Modeling Ultrasonic Speckles from Scatterers with Varying Spatial Organizations.
    Hu X; Zhang Y; Deng L; Cai G; Zhang Q; Zhou Y; Zhang K; Zhang J
    J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():8154780. PubMed ID: 29312656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The methods of mean scatterer spacing estimation and its application].
    Xu J; Li L; Cheng J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Dec; 14(4):393-6, 399. PubMed ID: 11367636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of Tissue Attenuation from Ultrasonic B-Mode Images-Spectral-Log-Difference and Method-of-Moments Algorithms Compared.
    Brandner DM; Cai X; Foiret J; Ferrara KW; Zagar BG
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33916496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A performance analysis of echographic ultrasonic techniques for non-invasive temperature estimation in hyperthermia range using phantoms with scatterers.
    Bazán I; Vazquez M; Ramos A; Vera A; Leija L
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Mar; 49(3):358-76. PubMed ID: 19100591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of adaptive threshold filtering on ultrasonic nakagami parameter to detect variation in scatterer concentration.
    Tsui PH; Wan YL; Huang CC; Wang MC
    Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 21213568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of tissue parameters derived from reflected ultrasound.
    Shiina T; Ikeda K; Saito M
    Med Prog Technol; 1987; 12(3-4):185-95. PubMed ID: 3306305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A statistical model for the ultrasonic backscattered echo from tissue containing microcalcifications.
    Shankar P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 May; 60(5):932-42. PubMed ID: 23661127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.