These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30628947)

  • 1. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Occhino JA; Habermann EB; Glasgow AE; Bews KA; Gershman B
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 29630983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
    Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications After Vaginal Vault Suspension Versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Elevated Body Mass Index: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Stairs J; Minassian V; Clancy A
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 28(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 35234179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.
    Boyd BAJ; Winkelman WD; Mishra K; Vittinghoff E; Jacoby VL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):405.e1-405.e7. PubMed ID: 33984303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apical Suspension Repair for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Menefee SA; Richter HE; Myers D; Moalli P; Weidner AC; Harvie HS; Rahn DD; Meriwether KV; Paraiso MFR; Whitworth R; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
    JAMA Surg; 2024 Aug; 159(8):845-855. PubMed ID: 38776067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative prolapse phenotype is predictive of surgical outcome with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Lowder JL; Zhao P; Bradley MS; Giugale LE; Xu H; Abramowitch SD; Bayly PV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep; 231(3):332.e1-332.e12. PubMed ID: 38642697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Erekson E; Murchison RL; Gerjevic KA; Meljen VT; Strohbehn K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):608.e1-608.e17. PubMed ID: 28578172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample.
    Slopnick EA; Petrikovets A; Sheyn D; Kim SP; Nguyen CT; Hijaz AK
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):603-609. PubMed ID: 30283975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy.
    Tyson MD; Wolter CE
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Feb; 34(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 24265258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative outcomes of reconstructive surgery for apical prolapse in the very elderly: a national contemporary analysis.
    Yadav GS; Chapman GC; Raju R; El-Nashar SA; Occhino JA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 33638678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National Assessment of Advancing Age on Perioperative Morbidity and Length of Stay Associated With Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Chaudhry Z; Cohen SA; Tarnay C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):482-485. PubMed ID: 27636219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.