These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30628961)

  • 1. Facial aesthetic fat graft retention rates after filtration, centrifugation, or sedimentation processing techniques measured using three-dimensional surface imaging devices.
    Wang GH; Zhao JF; Xue HY; Li D
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Jan; 132(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 30628961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional Volumetric Analysis of 3 Fat-Processing Techniques for Facial Fat Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Wu R; Yang X; Jin X; Lu H; Jia Z; Li B; Jiang H; Qi Z
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 May; 20(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 29327032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term volumetric retention of autologous fat grafting processed with closed-membrane filtration.
    Gerth DJ; King B; Rabach L; Glasgold RA; Glasgold MJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Sep; 34(7):985-94. PubMed ID: 25028738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Achieving optimal clinical outcomes in autologous fat grafting: A systematic review of processing techniques.
    Langridge BJ; Jasionowska S; Khan H; Awad L; Turner BRH; Varghese J; Butler PEM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jun; 81():9-25. PubMed ID: 37075610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of harvest and processing techniques for fat grafting and adipose stem cell isolation.
    Fisher C; Grahovac TL; Schafer ME; Shippert RD; Marra KG; Rubin JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):351-361. PubMed ID: 23584621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systemic review of autologous fat grafting survival rate and related severe complications.
    Yu NZ; Huang JZ; Zhang H; Wang Y; Wang XJ; Zhao R; Bai M; Long X
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 May; 128(9):1245-51. PubMed ID: 25947410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the current optimal fat grafting processing technique? A systematic review.
    Tuin AJ; Domerchie PN; Schepers RH; Willemsen JC; Dijkstra PU; Spijkervet FK; Vissink A; Jansma J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 44(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 26646638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volume Retention After Facial Fat Grafting and Relevant Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lv Q; Li X; Qi Y; Gu Y; Liu Z; Ma GE
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):506-520. PubMed ID: 31940073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In search of the optimal processing technique for fat grafting.
    Gupta R; Brace M; Taylor SM; Bezuhly M; Hong P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 25534059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective randomized study comparing centrifugation and sedimentation for fat grafting in breast reconstruction.
    Sarfati I; van la Parra RFD; Terem-Rapoport CA; Benyahi D; Nos C; Clough KB
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Sep; 70(9):1218-1228. PubMed ID: 28693983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volume retention rate after breast autogenous fat grafting and related influencing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hu S; Xu H
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():105-116. PubMed ID: 38160589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Different Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Grafting.
    Hanson SE; Garvey PB; Chang EI; Reece GP; Liu J; Baumann DP; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov; 150(5):955-962. PubMed ID: 35994347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Randomized Prospective Time and Motion Comparison of Techniques to Process Autologous Fat Grafts.
    Hanson SE; Garvey PB; Chang EI; Reece GP; Liu J; Baumann DP; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 May; 147(5):1035-1044. PubMed ID: 33890883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel noninvasive three-dimensional volumetric analysis for fat-graft survival in facial recontouring using the 3L and 3M technique.
    Zhu M; Xie Y; Zhu Y; Chai G; Li Q
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 26601875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Safety and Efficacy of Cell-Assisted Fat Grafting to Traditional Fat Grafting in the Anterior Mid-Face: An Indirect Assessment by 3D Imaging.
    Sasaki GH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):833-46. PubMed ID: 26335660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of the effectiveness and complications of fat grafting in the facial region.
    Gornitsky J; Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Azzi AJ; Gilardino MS
    JPRAS Open; 2019 Mar; 19():87-97. PubMed ID: 32158860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term clinical outcomes of fat grafting by low-pressure aspiration and slow centrifugation (Lopasce technique) for different indications.
    Ozkaya O; Egemen O; Barutça SA; Akan M
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Oct; 47(5):394-8. PubMed ID: 23952057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods used for evaluation of volume retention rate in autologous fat grafting for breast augmentation: a systematic review.
    Wang CL; Luan SS; Panayi AC; Xin MQ; Luan J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Sep; 132(18):2223-2228. PubMed ID: 31490259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fat Processing Techniques: A Narrative Review.
    Lin Y; Yang Y; Mu D
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):730-739. PubMed ID: 33399953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sustained Overcorrection After Autologous Facial Fat Grafting in the Pediatric Population: A Case Series.
    Tringale KR; Lance S; Schoenbrunner A; Gosman AA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 May; 78(5 Suppl 4):S217-S221. PubMed ID: 28177972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.