These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30629529)

  • 1. Blind Noisy Image Quality Assessment Using Sub-Band Kurtosis.
    Deng C; Wang S; Bovik AC; Huang GB; Zhao B
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2020 Mar; 50(3):1146-1156. PubMed ID: 30629529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Denoising Brain Images with the Aid of Discrete Wavelet Transform and Monarch Butterfly Optimization with Different Noises.
    Aravindan TE; Seshasayanan R
    J Med Syst; 2018 Sep; 42(11):207. PubMed ID: 30244351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Scenes Based on Entropy Differences in the DCT Domain.
    Yang X; Li F; Zhang W; He L
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. WaveCNet: Wavelet Integrated CNNs to Suppress Aliasing Effect for Noise-Robust Image Classification.
    Li Q; Shen L; Guo S; Lai Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():7074-7089. PubMed ID: 34351858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A shallow convolutional neural network for blind image sharpness assessment.
    Yu S; Wu S; Wang L; Jiang F; Xie Y; Li L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176632. PubMed ID: 28459832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise reduction based on partial-reference, dual-tree complex wavelet transform shrinkage.
    Fierro M; Ha HG; Ha YH
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 May; 22(5):1859-72. PubMed ID: 23314777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep learning on image denoising: An overview.
    Tian C; Fei L; Zheng W; Xu Y; Zuo W; Lin CW
    Neural Netw; 2020 Nov; 131():251-275. PubMed ID: 32829002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wavelet domain compounding for speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography.
    Xu J; Ou H; Sun C; Chui PC; Yang VX; Lam EY; Wong KK
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Sep; 18(9):096002. PubMed ID: 24002189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on the Fusion of Statistical and Perceptual Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiscale image denoising using goodness-of-fit test based on EDF statistics.
    Naveed K; Shaukat B; Ehsan S; Mcdonald-Maier KD; Ur Rehman N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216197. PubMed ID: 31075113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A robust hidden Markov Gauss mixture vector quantizer for a noisy source.
    Pyun KP; Lim J; Gray RM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1385-94. PubMed ID: 19457751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the wavelet transform in reduction of noise from simulated PET images.
    Shalchian B; Rajabi H; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2009 Dec; 37(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 19914973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Portal imaging: Performance improvement in noise reduction by means of wavelet processing.
    González-López A; Morales-Sánchez J; Larrey-Ruiz J; Bastida-Jumilla MC; Verdú-Monedero R
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):226-31. PubMed ID: 26602966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a discrete wavelet transform method and a modified undecimated discrete wavelet transform method for denoising of mammograms.
    Matsuyama E; Tsai DY; Lee Y; Takahashi N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3403-6. PubMed ID: 24110459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image Quality Assessment Using Human Visual DOG Model Fused With Random Forest.
    Pei SC; Chen LH
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Nov; 24(11):3282-92. PubMed ID: 26054064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient Image De-Noising Technique Based on Modified Cuckoo Search Algorithm.
    Sakthidasan Sankaran K ; Vasudevan N ; Kumara Guru Diderot P ; Nagarajan V
    J Med Syst; 2019 Aug; 43(10):307. PubMed ID: 31420756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microarray image denoising using complex Gaussian scale mixtures of complex wavelets.
    Srinivasan L; Rakvongthai Y; Oraintara S
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Jul; 18(4):1423-30. PubMed ID: 24760948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical characterization of portal images and noise from portal imaging systems.
    González-López A; Morales-Sánchez J; Verdú-Monedero R; Larrey-Ruiz J
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Jun; 26(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 22915239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A New Adaptive Gamma Correction Based Algorithm Using DWT-SVD for Non-Contrast CT Image Enhancement.
    Kallel F; Ben Hamida A
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2017 Dec; 16(8):666-675. PubMed ID: 29364122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.