BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30629777)

  • 1. Role and practice evolution for genetic counseling in the genomic era: The experience of Australian and UK genetics practitioners.
    Dwarte T; Barlow-Stewart K; O'Shea R; Dinger ME; Terrill B
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):378-387. PubMed ID: 30629777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.
    Rego S; Grove ME; Cho MK; Ormond KE
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2020 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 31570382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing: A call for action.
    Bunnik EM; Dondorp WJ; Bredenoord AL; de Wert G; Cornel MC
    Eur J Cancer; 2021 May; 148():405-410. PubMed ID: 33784533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mainstreaming genomic testing: pre-test counselling and informed consent.
    Cormack M; Irving KB; Cunningham F; Fennell AP
    Med J Aust; 2024 May; 220(8):403-406. PubMed ID: 38479398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.
    Fleming J; Terrill B; Dziadek M; Kirk EP; Roscioli T; Barlow-Stewart K
    Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 31085343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic Counseling in the Era of Genomics: What's all the Fuss about?
    Brett GR; Wilkins EJ; Creed ET; West K; Jarmolowicz A; Valente GM; Prawer Y; Lynch E; Macciocca I
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Sep; 27(5):1010-1021. PubMed ID: 29368275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.
    Tomlinson AN; Skinner D; Perry DL; Scollon SR; Roche MI; Bernhardt BA
    J Genet Couns; 2016 Feb; 25(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 25911622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.
    Bunnik EM; de Jong A; Nijsingh N; de Wert GM
    Bioethics; 2013 Jul; 27(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 23718722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing.
    Vears DF; Borry P; Savulescu J; Koplin JJ
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 33017265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic counselors' perceptions of uncertainty in pretest counseling for genomic sequencing: A qualitative study.
    Park J; Zayhowski K; Newson AJ; Ormond KE
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):292-303. PubMed ID: 30741463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical application of genomic high-throughput data: Infrastructural, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects.
    Umbach N; Beißbarth T; Bleckmann A; Duttge G; Flatau L; König A; Kuhn J; Perera-Bel J; Roschauer J; Schulze TG; Schweda M; Urban A; Zimmermann A; Sax U
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2020 Feb; 31():1-15. PubMed ID: 31866110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes toward offering genetic counseling for psychiatric conditions among genetics healthcare practitioners in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study.
    Rowlatt AE; McAllister M; Cuthbert A
    J Genet Couns; 2022 Feb; 31(1):279-290. PubMed ID: 34363721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic testing: a struggle for oncologists.
    Hede K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju172. PubMed ID: 24907388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
    Appelbaum PS; Parens E; Waldman CR; Klitzman R; Fyer A; Martinez J; Price WN; Chung WK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(4):22-32. PubMed ID: 24919982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
    Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Managing the ethical challenges of next-generation sequencing in genomic medicine.
    Clarke AJ
    Br Med Bull; 2014 Sep; 111(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25122627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the limits of genetic responsibility: communication and consent for tumour testing for Lynch syndrome.
    Shipman HE; Arribas-Allyon M; Murray A; Gaff CL
    Commun Med; 2013; 10(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 25233560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing.
    Fowler SA; Saunders CJ; Hoffman MA
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Feb; 27(1):104-114. PubMed ID: 28689263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: A comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings.
    Boardman F; Hale R
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2018 Nov; 6(6):1079-1096. PubMed ID: 30370638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readiness of clinical genetic healthcare professionals to provide genomic medicine: An Australian census.
    Nisselle A; Macciocca I; McKenzie F; Vuong H; Dunlop K; McClaren B; Metcalfe S; Gaff C;
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):367-377. PubMed ID: 30779404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.