127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30629926)
1. Esophageal Biomechanics Revisited: A Tale of Tenacity, Anastomoses, and Suture Bite Lengths in Swine.
Oetzmann von Sochaczewski C; Tagkalos E; Lindner A; Lang H; Heimann A; Schröder A; Grimminger PP; Muensterer OJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Jun; 107(6):1670-1677. PubMed ID: 30629926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Continuous Suture Anastomosis Outperforms a Simple Interrupted Suture Anastomosis in Esophageal Elongation.
Oetzmann von Sochaczewski C; Tagkalos E; Lindner A; Lang H; Heimann A; Muensterer OJ
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Apr; 31(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 32422674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of anastomotic suturing techniques in the rat esophagus.
Cui Y; Urschel JD
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1999 Aug; 40(4):613-4. PubMed ID: 10532230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using simple interrupted suture anastomoses may impair translatability of experimental rodent oesophageal surgery.
Tagkalos E; Lindner A; Gruber G; Lang H; Heimann A; Grimminger PP; Muensterer OJ; Oetzmann von Sochaczewski C
Acta Chir Belg; 2020 Oct; 120(5):310-314. PubMed ID: 31012385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanics of esophageal elongation with traction sutures on experimental animal model.
Toczewski K; Gerus S; Kaczorowski M; Kozuń M; Wolicka J; Bobrek K; Filipiak J; Patkowski D
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3420. PubMed ID: 35233044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical Aspects in Esophageal Lengthening: An Investigation of Traction Procedures and Suturing Techniques in Swine.
Oetzmann von Sochaczewski C; Tagkalos E; Lindner A; Lang H; Heimann A; Muensterer OJ
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2019 Oct; 29(5):481-484. PubMed ID: 30566985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Omentoplasty reinforcement of esophagogastric anastomoses in rats.
Cui Y; Urschel JD
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 6(6):361-2. PubMed ID: 11173348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial Resistance of Carina Anastomoses with Increasing Tensile Stress: An ex vivo Model Comparing Different Suture Techniques.
Kirschbaum A; Hemmerling S; Steinfeldt T; Bartsch DK; Mirow N
Eur Surg Res; 2017; 58(1-2):20-26. PubMed ID: 27577554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of tension on esophagogastric anastomotic wound healing in rats.
Cui Y; Chen H
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2003 Dec; 44(6):775-8. PubMed ID: 14994746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of pyloric drainage on the healing of esophagogastric anastomoses in rats.
Cui Y; Urschel JD; Petrelli NJ
Can J Surg; 2000 Dec; 43(6):456-8. PubMed ID: 11129835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of microvascular anastomoses prepared by various suturing techniques.
Szabo B; Fazekas L; Ghanem S; Godo ZA; Madar J; Apro A; Nemeth N
Injury; 2020 Dec; 51(12):2866-2873. PubMed ID: 32147145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Circular myotomy and esophageal length and safe esophageal anastomosis: an experimental study.
Takada Y; Kent G; Filler RM
J Pediatr Surg; 1981 Jun; 16(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 7252738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Animal model to compare the effects of suture technique on cross-sectional compliance on end-to-side anastomoses.
Tozzi P; Hayoz D; Ruchat P; Corno A; Oedman C; Botta U; von Segesser LK
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2001 Apr; 19(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 11306316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial Load Stability of Different Trachea Suture Techniques: Tests on an Ex Vivo Model.
Kirschbaum A; Abing H; Mirow N
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jun; 158(6):1079-1083. PubMed ID: 29436277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapidly resorbable vs. non-resorbable suture for experimental colonic anastomoses in rats--a randomized experimental study.
Klein M; Pommergaard HC; Gögenur I; Rosenberg J
Int J Surg; 2011; 9(4):332-4. PubMed ID: 21338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
