782 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30630257)
1. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel porous-structure implant: finite element study.
Inglam S; Chantarapanich N; Suebnukarn S; Vatanapatimakul N; Sucharitpwatskul S; Sitthiseripratip K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e48-56. PubMed ID: 23527368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental evaluation of stress distribution with narrow diameter implants: A finite element analysis.
Cinel S; Celik E; Sagirkaya E; Sahin O
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):417-425. PubMed ID: 28645665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress Analysis Around Reduced-Diameter Zirconia and Titanium One-Piece Implants With and Without Microthreads in the Neck: Experimental and Finite Element Analysis.
Al-Zordk W; Ghazy M; El-Anwar M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 32142567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Influence of thread shapes of custommade root-analogue implants on stress distribution of peri-implant bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Lin CP; Lu SH; Zhu JX; Hu HC; Yue ZG; Tang ZH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Dec; 51(6):1130-1137. PubMed ID: 31848517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
