798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30630257)
21. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of influence of occlusal surface height on stress distribution around posterior implant-supported single crown].
Zhao X; Zhang L; Sun J; Yang ZY; Xie QF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 26885916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.
Corrêa CB; Margonar R; Noritomi PY; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24355510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
Himmlová L; Dostálová T; Kácovský A; Konvicková S
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 14739889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kan B; Coskunses FM; Mutlu I; Ugur L; Meral DG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):908-13. PubMed ID: 25818310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of occlusal splint and implant connection on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis and peri-implantal bone.
Dos Santos Marsico V; Lehmann RB; de Assis Claro CA; Amaral M; Vitti RP; Neves ACC; da Silva Concilio LR
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Nov; 80():141-148. PubMed ID: 28866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect Of Tapered And Cylindrical Implants On Stress Distribution In Different Bone Qualities: A Finite Element Analysis.
Sivrikaya EC; Omezli MM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):e99–e105. PubMed ID: 31184631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stress and strain analysis of the bone-implant interface: a comparison of fiber-reinforced composite and titanium implants utilizing 3-dimensional finite element study.
Shinya A; Ballo AM; Lassila LV; Shinya A; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():133-40. PubMed ID: 20545537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
