227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30630416)
1. The current use of feasibility studies in the assessment of feasibility for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.
Kristunas CA; Hemming K; Eborall H; Eldridge S; Gray LJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):12. PubMed ID: 30630416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope.
Kristunas CA; Hemming K; Eborall HC; Gray LJ
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(7):e017290. PubMed ID: 28765139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical and epistemic issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trials.
Federico CA; Heagerty PJ; Lantos J; O'Rourke P; Rahimzadeh V; Sugarman J; Weinfurt K; Wendler D; Wilfond BS; Magnus D
Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Apr; 115():106703. PubMed ID: 35176501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials in low-resource settings.
Joag K; Ambrosio G; Kestler E; Weijer C; Hemming K; Van der Graaf R
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):703. PubMed ID: 31852547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflection on modern methods: when is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial a good study design choice?
Hemming K; Taljaard M
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 49(3):1043-1052. PubMed ID: 32386407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022.
Nevins P; Ryan M; Davis-Plourde K; Ouyang Y; Pereira Macedo JA; Meng C; Tong G; Wang X; Ortiz-Reyes L; Caille A; Li F; Taljaard M
Clin Trials; 2024 Apr; 21(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 37990575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.
Kristunas C; Morris T; Gray L
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e017151. PubMed ID: 29146637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review.
Hemming K; Carroll K; Thompson J; Forbes A; Taljaard M;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():77-88. PubMed ID: 30500405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introducing the new CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
Hemming K; Taljaard M; Grimshaw J
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 30658677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of reporting of pilot and feasibility cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.
Chan CL; Leyrat C; Eldridge SM
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e016970. PubMed ID: 29122791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recruitment and implementation challenges were common in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a methodological review.
Caille A; Taljaard M; Le Vilain-Abraham F; Le Moigne A; Copas AJ; Tubach F; Dechartres A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 148():93-103. PubMed ID: 35483552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of registered and published intervention fidelity assessment in cluster randomised trials of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review.
Pérez MC; Minoyan N; Ridde V; Sylvestre MP; Johri M
Trials; 2018 Jul; 19(1):410. PubMed ID: 30064484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs.
Hemming K; Lilford R; Girling AJ
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 25346484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of registered and published intervention fidelity assessment in cluster randomised trials of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review protocol.
Pérez MC; Minoyan N; Ridde V; Sylvestre MP; Johri M
Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):177. PubMed ID: 27756435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation procedures for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.
Grayling MJ; Mander AP; Wason JMS
Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):903-916. PubMed ID: 30073685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
Martin J; Taljaard M; Girling A; Hemming K
BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010166. PubMed ID: 26846897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach.
Hemming K; Taljaard M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():137-46. PubMed ID: 26344808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Considerations Before Selecting a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study.
Nguyen AM; Cleland CM; Dickinson LM; Barry MP; Cykert S; Duffy FD; Kuzel AJ; Lindner SR; Parchman ML; Shelley DR; Walunas TL
Ann Fam Med; 2022; 20(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 35606135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
