130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30630872)
1. Microvessel density in breast cancer: the impact of field area on prognostic informativeness.
Kraby MR; Opdahl S; Russnes HG; Bofin AM
J Clin Pathol; 2019 Apr; 72(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30630872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying tumour vascularity in non-luminal breast cancers.
Kraby MR; Opdahl S; Akslen LA; Bofin AM
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Sep; 70(9):766-774. PubMed ID: 28249942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hot spot microvessel density and the mitotic activity index are strong additional prognostic indicators in invasive breast cancer.
de Jong JS; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Histopathology; 2000 Apr; 36(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 10759944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microvascular proliferation in luminal A and basal-like breast cancer subtypes.
Kraby MR; Krüger K; Opdahl S; Vatten LJ; Akslen LA; Bofin AM
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Nov; 68(11):891-7. PubMed ID: 26175265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast carcinoma vascularity: a comparison of manual microvessel count and Chalkley count.
Dhakal HP; Bassarova A; Naume B; Synnestvedt M; Borgen E; Kaaresen R; Schlichting E; Wiedswang G; Giercksky KE; Nesland JM
Histol Histopathol; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1049-59. PubMed ID: 19554512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Angiogenesis in breast cancer: a comparative study of the observer variability of methods for determining microvessel density.
Hansen S; Grabau DA; Rose C; Bak M; Sørensen FB
Lab Invest; 1998 Dec; 78(12):1563-73. PubMed ID: 9881956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microvessel density compared with the Chalkley count in a prognostic study of angiogenesis in breast cancer patients.
Hansen S; Sørensen FB; Vach W; Grabau DA; Bak M; Rose C
Histopathology; 2004 May; 44(5):428-36. PubMed ID: 15139990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of microvessel density in lymph node negative breast carcinoma.
Costello P; McCann A; Carney DN; Dervan PA
Hum Pathol; 1995 Nov; 26(11):1181-4. PubMed ID: 7590689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative immunohistochemistry of factor VIII-related antigen in breast carcinoma: a comparison of computer-assisted image analysis with established counting methods.
Kohlberger PD; Obermair A; Sliutz G; Heinzl H; Koelbl H; Breitenecker G; Gitsch G; Kainz C
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 8659444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microvessel proliferation by co-expression of endothelial nestin and Ki-67 is associated with a basal-like phenotype and aggressive features in breast cancer.
Krüger K; Stefansson IM; Collett K; Arnes JB; Aas T; Akslen LA
Breast; 2013 Jun; 22(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 22840462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining the technique of angiogenesis assessment in invasive breast cancer.
Martin L; Green B; Renshaw C; Lowe D; Rudland P; Leinster SJ; Winstanley J
Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(8):1046-54. PubMed ID: 9376265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Immunohistochemical study of 142 cases].
Ryska A; Hovorková E; Skrabková Z
Cesk Patol; 2001 Jul; 37(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 11669026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microvessel Density (MVD) in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Krishnapriya S; Malipatil B; Surekha S; Sundersingh S; Sridevi V; Ananthi B; Selvaluxmy G; Ganesan TS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 May; 20(5):1537-1545. PubMed ID: 31128060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: correlation of microvessel density and microvessel area with other prognostic factors.
Sharma SG; Aggarwal N; Gupta SD; Singh MK; Gupta R; Dinda AK
Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 20535637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of investigator experience and microscopic field size on microvessel density in node-negative breast carcinoma.
Vermeulen PB; Libura M; Libura J; O'Neill PJ; van Dam P; Van Marck E; Van Oosterom AT; Dirix LY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1997 Jan; 42(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 9138605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relation of microvessel density with microvascular invasion, metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.
Yildiz E; Ayan S; Goze F; Gokce G; Gultekin EY
BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(6):758-64. PubMed ID: 18070177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) as prognostic indicators in carcinoma breast.
Shivakumar S; Prabhakar BT; Jayashree K; Rajan MG; Salimath BP
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 135(4):627-36. PubMed ID: 18936974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of microvessel parameters in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and fibroadenomas: a morphometric study.
Boruah D; Bhatia JK; Rai A; Srinivas V; Nijhawan VS
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Dec; 25():72-78. PubMed ID: 27806851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumor microvessel density, p53 expression, tumor size, and peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion are relevant prognostic markers in node-negative breast carcinoma.
Gasparini G; Weidner N; Bevilacqua P; Maluta S; Dalla Palma P; Caffo O; Barbareschi M; Boracchi P; Marubini E; Pozza F
J Clin Oncol; 1994 Mar; 12(3):454-66. PubMed ID: 7509851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognosis of invasive breast cancer after adjuvant therapy evaluated with VEGF microvessel density and microvascular imaging.
Li Y; Wei X; Zhang S; Zhang J
Tumour Biol; 2015 Nov; 36(11):8755-60. PubMed ID: 26052072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
