135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30632173)
1. Impact of varying planning parameters on proton pencil beam scanning dose distributions in four commercial treatment planning systems.
Alshaikhi J; Doolan PJ; D'Souza D; Holloway SM; Amos RA; Royle G
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1150-1162. PubMed ID: 30632173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of planned dose reporting methods on Gamma pass rates for IROC lung and liver motion phantoms treated with pencil beam scanning protons.
Kang Y; Shen J; Liu W; Taylor PA; Mehrens HS; Ding X; Hu Y; Tryggestad E; Keole SR; Schild SE; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):108. PubMed ID: 31208439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning.
Kraan AC; Depauw N; Clasie B; Giunta M; Madden T; Kooy HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 29148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of motion management parameters in a synchrotron-based spot scanning system.
Johnson JE; Herman MG; Kruse JJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):69-77. PubMed ID: 31538720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a new treatment planning approach accounting for in vivo proton range verification.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Kamp F; Pinto M; Niepel K; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215025. PubMed ID: 30375361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and long-term stability of a comprehensive daily QA program for a modern pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy delivery system.
Rana S; Bennouna J; Samuel EJJ; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):29-44. PubMed ID: 30920146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.
Liu C; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Korte S; Shen J; Ding X; Hu Y; Kang Y; Keole SR; Sio TT; Wong WW; Sahoo N; Bues M; Liu W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jun; 101(2):479-489. PubMed ID: 29550033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Log file-based dose reconstruction and accumulation for 4D adaptive pencil beam scanned proton therapy in a clinical treatment planning system: Implementation and proof-of-concept.
Meijers A; Jakobi A; Stützer K; Guterres Marmitt G; Both S; Langendijk JA; Richter C; Knopf A
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 30609061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.
Yu J; Beltran CJ; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081706. PubMed ID: 25086516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Range optimization for mono- and bi-energetic proton modulated arc therapy with pencil beam scanning.
Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Kirk M; Fager M; Burgdorf B; Stowe M; Solberg T; Carabe A
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N565-N574. PubMed ID: 27740944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity-modulated proton therapy planning.
Hillbrand M; Georg D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 11(4):3219. PubMed ID: 21081877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of a real-time tumor monitoring system into gated proton spot-scanning beam therapy: an initial phantom study using patient tumor trajectory data.
Matsuura T; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujii Y; Umezawa M; Takao S; Nihongi H; Toramatsu C; Sutherland K; Suzuki R; Ishikawa M; Kinoshita R; Maeda K; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071729. PubMed ID: 23822433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.
Zeng C; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Goldberg S; Niemierko A; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Trofimov A
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051708. PubMed ID: 23635256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the range shifter model for proton pencil-beam scanning for the Eclipse v.11 treatment planning system.
Matysiak W; Yeung D; Slopsema R; Li Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):391-404. PubMed ID: 27074461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
