These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30632935)

  • 41. Construction and demolition waste as a source of PVC for recycling.
    Prestes SM; Mancini SD; Rodolfo A; Keiroglo RC
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Feb; 30(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 21967989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reverse logistics network for municipal solid waste management: The inclusion of waste pickers as a Brazilian legal requirement.
    Ferri GL; Chaves Gde L; Ribeiro GM
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():173-91. PubMed ID: 25840735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Identification of critical factors in construction and demolition waste recycling by the grey-DEMATEL approach: a Chinese perspective.
    Liu H; Long H; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(8):8507-8525. PubMed ID: 31907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Research on the Evolutionary Game of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) Recycling Units' Green Behavior, Considering Remanufacturing Capability.
    Li X; Huang R; Dai J; Li J; Shen Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. GIS-based planning system for managing the flow of construction and demolition waste in Brazil.
    Paz DHFD; Lafayette KPV; Sobral MDC
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Jun; 36(6):541-549. PubMed ID: 29776320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A bi-level environmental impact assessment framework for comparing construction and demolition waste management strategies.
    Yazdanbakhsh A
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():401-412. PubMed ID: 29709308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reverse logistics systems in Brazil: Comparative study and interest of multistakeholders.
    Rebehy PCPW; Andrade Dos Santos Lima S; Novi JC; Salgado AP
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 250():109223. PubMed ID: 31545173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Analysis of efficiency of waste reverse logistics for recycling.
    Veiga MM
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10 Suppl):26-34. PubMed ID: 23997069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A study on the waste generation rates and recycling potential for the construction and demolition waste in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    Haque SE; Nahar N; Haque MS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Jan; 196(2):183. PubMed ID: 38253941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes.
    Bovea MD; Powell JC
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():151-72. PubMed ID: 26919970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Management of the construction and demolition waste (CDW) and determination of the best disposal alternative by FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process): A case study of Tehran, Iran.
    Past V; Yaghmaeian K; Naderi M; Naderi N
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Apr; 73(4):271-284. PubMed ID: 36880989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A mini review of construction and demolition waste management in India.
    Faruqi MHZ; Siddiqui FZ
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jul; 38(7):708-716. PubMed ID: 32347194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Is selective demolition always a sustainable choice?
    Pantini S; Rigamonti L
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 103():169-176. PubMed ID: 31887689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Overview regarding construction and demolition waste in Spain.
    Rodríguez-Robles D; García-González J; Juan-Valdés A; Morán-Del Pozo JM; Guerra-Romero MI
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(23):3060-70. PubMed ID: 25230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Environmental assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling in Bolivia: Focus on transportation distances and selective collection rates.
    Ferronato N; Guisbert Lizarazu GE; Gorritty Portillo MA; Moresco L; Conti F; Torretta V
    Waste Manag Res; 2022 Jun; 40(6):793-805. PubMed ID: 34190007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clean construction and demolition waste material cycles through optimised pre-demolition waste audit documentation: A review on building material assessment tools.
    Rašković M; Ragossnig AM; Kondracki K; Ragossnig-Angst M
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):923-941. PubMed ID: 32635832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Environmental performance of construction and demolition waste management strategies for valorization of recycled coarse aggregate.
    Waskow R; Gonçalves Maciel V; Tubino R; Passuello A
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113094. PubMed ID: 34153580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of recycled concrete aggregates for their suitability in construction activities: An experimental study.
    Puthussery JV; Kumar R; Garg A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():270-276. PubMed ID: 27353393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quantifying the embodied carbon saving potential of recycling construction and demolition waste in the Greater Bay Area, China: Status quo and future scenarios.
    Peng Z; Lu W; Webster CJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148427. PubMed ID: 34144235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of Recycler Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance of Construction and Demolition Waste Resource Utilization.
    Zheng H; Li X; Zhu X; Huang Y; Liu Z; Liu Y; Liu J; Li X; Li Y; Li C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.