These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30633311)

  • 1. [The Study of Reliability and Validity of the Pain Coping Inventory].
    Hocaoğlu A; Sertel Berk HÖ; Ketenci A
    Agri; 2019 Jan; 31(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 30633311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pain-coping strategies in chronic pain patients: psychometric characteristics of the pain-coping inventory (PCI).
    Kraaimaat FW; Evers AW
    Int J Behav Med; 2003; 10(4):343-63. PubMed ID: 14734263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Pain coping strategies: French adaptation of the coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ-F)].
    Irachabal S; Koleck M; Rascle N; Bruchon-Schweitzer M
    Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18514150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of spinal cord lesion-related coping strategies.
    Paker N; Bugdayci D; Kesiktas N; Sahin M; Elfström ML
    Spinal Cord; 2014 May; 52(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 24322215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with cancer.
    Cetin AA; Bektas H; Ozdogan M
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Feb; 20():1-9. PubMed ID: 25937491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coping and catastrophizing in chronic pain: a psychometric analysis and comparison of two measures.
    Stewart MW; Harvey ST; Evans IM
    J Clin Psychol; 2001 Jan; 57(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 11211281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Active or passive pain coping strategies in hip and knee osteoarthritis? Results of a national survey of 4,719 patients in a primary care setting.
    Perrot S; Poiraudeau S; Kabir M; Bertin P; Sichere P; Serrie A; Rannou F
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Nov; 59(11):1555-62. PubMed ID: 18975370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: confirmatory factor analysis of the French version.
    Truchon M; Côté D; Irachabal S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Feb; 7():13. PubMed ID: 16478541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42: reliability and validity.
    Romano JM; Jensen MP; Turner JA
    Pain; 2003 Jul; 104(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12855315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL).
    Reininga IH; Brouwer S; Dijkstra A; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Wendt KW; El Moumni M
    Injury; 2015 Feb; 46(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 25441575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary assessment: the Pain Inventory and the Pain Coping Tool.
    Arathuzik D
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 1994; 11(5):25-9. PubMed ID: 7880645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.
    Gunaydin G; Hazar Kanik Z; Karabicak GO; Sozlu U; Pala OO; Alkan ZB; Basar S; Citaker S
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 26898339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Pain Coping Inventory].
    Oliveira P; Costa ME
    Acta Reumatol Port; 2012; 37(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 23149634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Danish adaptation of the Pain Coping Questionnaire for children: preliminary data concerning reliability and validity.
    Thastum M; Zachariae R; Schøler M; Herlin T
    Acta Paediatr; 1999 Feb; 88(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 10102143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Pain Coping Questionnaire in Finnish.
    Marttinen MK; Santavirta N; Kauppi MJ; Pohjankoski H; Vuorimaa H
    Eur J Pain; 2018 May; 22(5):1016-1025. PubMed ID: 29388281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.
    Akmaz HE; Uyar M; Kuzeyli Yıldırım Y; Akın Korhan E
    Balkan Med J; 2018 May; 35(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 29843496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Turkish validity and reliability study of fear of pain questionnaire-III].
    Ünver S; Turan FN
    Agri; 2018 Jan; 30(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 29450872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for stressful situations (CISS): a contribution to the cross-cultural studies of coping].
    Furukawa T; Suzuki-Moor A; Saito Y; Hamanaka T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 1993; 95(8):602-20. PubMed ID: 8234537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory.
    Hadjistavropoulos HD; MacLeod FK; Asmundson GJG
    Pain; 1999 Apr; 80(3):471-481. PubMed ID: 10342409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in patients with leukemia.
    Biçici B; Güneş UY
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Dec; 21(23-24):3328-34. PubMed ID: 22686194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.