354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30635745)
1. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients.
Sustar M; Cvenkel B; Brecelj J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 118(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 18932006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Kirkiewicz M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26831670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application of photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open-angle Glaucoma.
Huang L; Shen X; Fan N; He J
Eye Sci; 2012 Sep; 27(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 22993054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.
Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Walters JW
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 11157891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of inner retinal function at different stages of primary open angle glaucoma using the photopic negative response (PhNR) measured by RETeval electroretinography.
Hidaka T; Chuman H; Ikeda Y
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 262(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 37535182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RETeval Portable Electroretinogram Parameters in Different Severity Stages of Glaucoma.
Kita Y; Holló G; Saito T; Momota Y; Kita R; Tsunoda K; Hirakata A
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jul; 29(7):572-580. PubMed ID: 32287150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regional variations in correlation between photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms and ganglion cell complex in glaucoma.
Machida S; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Apr; 40(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24871085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.
Wang J; Cheng H; Hu YS; Tang RA; Frishman LJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23. PubMed ID: 22273726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram.
Frishman L; Sustar M; Kremers J; McAnany JJ; Sarossy M; Tzekov R; Viswanathan S
Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(3):207-211. PubMed ID: 29855761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons of photopic negative responses elicited by different conditions from glaucomatous eyes.
Hara Y; Machida S; Ebihara S; Ishizuka M; Tada A; Nishimura T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 64(2):114-126. PubMed ID: 31900870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.
Joshi NR; Ly E; Viswanathan S
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28508299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between Macular Vessel Density and Focal Electroretinograms in Early Normal Tension Glaucoma.
Honda H; Anraku A; Ishida K; Enomoto N; Tomita G
Curr Eye Res; 2019 Jul; 44(7):753-759. PubMed ID: 30869542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The photopic negative response of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram in glaucomas and normal subjects.
Wakili N; Horn FK; Jünemann AG; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Korth M; Kremers J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 117(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18273658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship among Photopic Negative Response, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, and Visual Field between Normal and POAG Eyes.
Shen X; Huang L; Fan N; He J
ISRN Ophthalmol; 2013; 2013():182021. PubMed ID: 24558598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alterations of photopic negative response of multifocal electroretinogram in patients with glaucoma.
Kaneko M; Machida S; Hoshi Y; Kurosaka D
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jan; 40(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 24832792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.
Colotto A; Falsini B; Salgarello T; Iarossi G; Galan ME; Scullica L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2205-11. PubMed ID: 10892864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
