These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30636853)

  • 21. Digital radiography reject analysis: data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals.
    Foos DH; Sehnert WJ; Reiner B; Siegel EL; Segal A; Waldman DL
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Mar; 22(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 18446413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evaluation of effect of developer age in the detection of approximal caries using three speed dental x-ray films: an in-vitro study.
    Madalli VB; Annigeri RG; Basavaraddi SM
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Mar; 8(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 24783146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The cost of perfection: An investigation into the unnecessary rejection of clinically acceptable lateral wrist imaging.
    Steward A; Semsem S; Currie K; Bentley L; Mineo R; Holliday M; McAnulty K; Master V
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Dec; 70(4):380-387. PubMed ID: 37439053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital radiography reject analysis: A comparison between two radiology departments in New Zealand.
    Bantas G; Sweeney RJ; Mdletshe S
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Jun; 70(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 36657740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The assessment of image quality and diagnostic value in X-ray images: a survey on radiographers' reasons for rejecting images.
    Kjelle E; Chilanga C
    Insights Imaging; 2022 Mar; 13(1):36. PubMed ID: 35244800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiographic trends of dental offices and dental schools.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; Conway B; Hart JC; Boyce PR; Antonsen RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):1104-10. PubMed ID: 10422407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image rejects in digital skeletal radiography in two public hospitals in Norway.
    Hofmann B
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Oct; 29(6):1063-1067. PubMed ID: 37741144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation Protection Evaluation of Medical X-ray Imaging Centers in Qazvin, Iran.
    Esfahani AJ; Cheraghi S
    Health Phys; 2021 Nov; 121(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34392253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Radiation protection in diagnostic radiology].
    Mini R
    Ther Umsch; 1992 Jun; 49(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 1636159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computed radiography X-ray exposure trends.
    Seibert JA; Shelton DK; Moore EH
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 8796680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. To keep or reject, that is the question - A survey on radiologists and radiographers' assessments of plain radiography images.
    Kjelle E; Schanche AK; Hafskjold L
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 32682730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Local diagnostic reference levels for adult posteroanterior (PA) chest x-ray examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Teferi S; Admassie D; Worku A; Zewdeneh D
    Ethiop Med J; 2010 Jan; 48(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20607998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    McKenna C; Wade R; Faria R; Yang H; Stirk L; Gummerson N; Sculpher M; Woolacott N
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(14):1-188. PubMed ID: 22449757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low-dose radiography of scoliosis in children. A comparison of methods.
    Kalmar JA; Jones JP; Merritt CR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Apr; 19(7):818-23. PubMed ID: 8202801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.
    Gadeholt G; Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Asp T
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 2509204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimization of patient radiation protection in pelvic X-ray examination in Ghana.
    Ofori EK; Antwi WK; Scutt DN; Ward M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 13(4):3719. PubMed ID: 22766943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Technical note: Energy dependence of the Gafchromic EBT4 film: Dose-response curves for 70 kV, 6 MV, 6 MV FFF, 10 MV FFF, and 15 MV x-ray beams.
    Chan MF; Park J; Aydin R; Lim SB
    Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3738-3745. PubMed ID: 36695666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran.
    Rasuli B; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Ghorbani M; Juybari RT; Naserpour M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):374-386. PubMed ID: 26894357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.