177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30638694)
21. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesion by sound touch elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Huang L; Ma M; Du Z; Liu Z; Gong X
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219943. PubMed ID: 31318932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast Lesions: Quantitative Diagnosis Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography-A Systematic Review and Meta--Analysis.
Liu B; Zheng Y; Huang G; Lin M; Shan Q; Lu Y; Tian W; Xie X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):835-47. PubMed ID: 26778289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results.
Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Tanter M; Sigal-Zafrani B; Bercoff J; Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Fink M; Neuenschwander S
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 20505064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. What Help Could Ultrasound Elastography Give to the Diagnosis of Breast Papillary Lesions?
Li LJ; Yao JY; Zhou XC; Zhao XB; Zhong WJ; Ou B; Luo BM; Hao SY; Zhi H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 28256344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Tissue Stiffness Around Lesions by Sound Touch Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Malignancy Diagnosis.
Cui YY; He NA; Ye XJ; Hu L; Xie L; Zhong W; Zhang CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1672-1680. PubMed ID: 35672199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preliminary Results of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging by Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses for Evaluation of Breast Lesions.
Wang L; Wan CF; Du J; Li FH
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Oct; 37(10):2405-2412. PubMed ID: 29656388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical application of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging with Virtual Touch IQ in breast ultrasound: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of a new technique.
Kapetas P; Pinker-Domenig K; Woitek R; Clauser P; Bernathova M; Spick C; Helbich T; Baltzer PA
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 27055918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Kong WT; Zhou WJ; Wang Y; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2019 Oct; 46(4):459-466. PubMed ID: 31102067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the "stiff rim" sign.
Zhou J; Zhan W; Chang C; Zhang X; Jia Y; Dong Y; Zhou C; Sun J; Grant EG
Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 24661245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic Performance of Multiple Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules.
Zhang L; Ding Z; Dong F; Wu H; Liang W; Tian H; Ye X; Luo H; Xu J
Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():1359. PubMed ID: 30534072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
