176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30638733)
21. A stepwise approach using metabolic volume and SUVmax to differentiate malignancy and dysplasia from benign colonic uptakes on 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Oh JR; Min JJ; Song HC; Chong A; Kim GE; Choi C; Seo JH; Bom HS
Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 37(6):e134-40. PubMed ID: 22614211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T.
Magometschnigg HF; Baltzer PA; Fueger B; Helbich TH; Karanikas G; Dubsky P; Rudas M; Weber M; Pinker K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1656-1665. PubMed ID: 26121928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. FDG-PET/CT assessment of misty mesentery: feasibility for distinguishing viable mesenteric malignancy from stable conditions.
Nakatani K; Nakamoto Y; Togashi K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e380-5. PubMed ID: 23619310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The value of multiparameter
Jiang Y; Hou G; Zhu Z; Huo L; Cheng W; Li F
Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12887. PubMed ID: 32732920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The value of dual time point (18)F-FDG PET imaging for the differentiation between malignant and benign lesions.
Lan XL; Zhang YX; Wu ZJ; Jia Q; Wei H; Gao ZR
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):756-64. PubMed ID: 18555033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlations between F-18 FDG PET/CT and pathological findings in soft tissue lesions.
Nose H; Otsuka H; Otomi Y; Terazawa K; Takao S; Iwamoto S; Harada M
J Med Invest; 2013; 60(3-4):184-90. PubMed ID: 24190034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improved detection of metastatic lymph nodes in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma by combined interpretation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Lee JY; Kim YH; Park YJ; Park SB; Chung HW; Zo JI; Shim YM; Lee KS; Choi JY
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 31227017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The value of intratumoral heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG uptake to differentiate between primary benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumours on PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Tani A; Yoshiura T
Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1055):20150552. PubMed ID: 26337605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of several FDG PET parameters for prediction of soft tissue tumour grade at primary diagnosis and recurrence.
Fendler WP; Chalkidis RP; Ilhan H; Knösel T; Herrmann K; Issels RD; Bartenstein P; Cyran CC; Lindner LH; Hacker M
Eur Radiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):2214-21. PubMed ID: 25693667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dual-time point
Parghane RV; Basu S
Semin Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 47(4):373-391. PubMed ID: 28583277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 11C-choline PET for the detection of bone and soft tissue tumours in comparison with FDG PET.
Zhang H; Tian M; Oriuchi N; Higuchi T; Watanabe H; Aoki J; Tanada S; Endo K
Nucl Med Commun; 2003 Mar; 24(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 12612468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differentiation and diagnosis of benign and malignant testicular lesions using 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Shao D; Gao Q; Tian XW; Wang SY; Liang CH; Wang SX
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():114-120. PubMed ID: 28668404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Texture analysis of FDG PET/CT for differentiating between FDG-avid benign and metastatic adrenal tumors: efficacy of combining SUV and texture parameters.
Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Nakajo M; Shinaji T; Nakabeppu Y; Fukukura Y; Yoshiura T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2882-2889. PubMed ID: 28612161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic value of preoperative SUVmax on FDG-PET/CT for the detection of ovarian cancer.
Tanizaki Y; Kobayashi A; Shiro M; Ota N; Takano R; Mabuchi Y; Yagi S; Minami S; Terada M; Ino K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Mar; 24(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 24463640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients to differentiate between malignant transformation of endometrioma and endometrioma.
Kusunoki S; Ota T; Kaneda H; Kimura M; Terao Y; Takeda S
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 21(6):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27380167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of Histologic Subtype and FNCLCC Grade by SUVmax Measured on
Li CP; Liu DN; Zhou NN; Tian XY; Wang Z; Liu BN; Hao CY
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():7191363. PubMed ID: 33505228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Value of Volume-Based Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Parameters for Characterizing Thyroid Incidentaloma.
Shi H; Yuan Z; Yuan Z; Yang C; Zhang J; Shou Y; Zhang W; Ping Z; Gao X; Liu S
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 29520193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Computed Tomography and 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cardiac Masses.
D'Angelo EC; Paolisso P; Vitale G; Foà A; Bergamaschi L; Magnani I; Saturi G; Rinaldi A; Toniolo S; Renzulli M; Attinà D; Lovato L; Lima GM; Bonfiglioli R; Fanti S; Leone O; Saponara M; Pantaleo MA; Rucci P; Di Marco L; Pacini D; Pizzi C; Galiè N
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Nov; 13(11):2400-2411. PubMed ID: 32563654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Maximum standardized uptake value on
Rhu J; Hyun SH; Lee KH; Jo SJ; Lee KW; Park JB; Kim SJ
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6605. PubMed ID: 31036901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
