323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30638968)
21. Effect of non-acoustic parameters on heterogeneous sonoporation mediated by single-pulse ultrasound and microbubbles.
Qin P; Xu L; Han T; Du L; Yu AC
Ultrason Sonochem; 2016 Jul; 31():107-15. PubMed ID: 26964929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Temporal effect of inertial cavitation with and without microbubbles on surface deformation of agarose S gel in the presence of 1-MHz focused ultrasound.
Tomita Y; Matsuura T; Kodama T
Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():1-5. PubMed ID: 25130135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bursting bubbles and bilayers.
Wrenn SP; Dicker SM; Small EF; Dan NR; Mleczko M; Schmitz G; Lewin PA
Theranostics; 2012; 2(12):1140-59. PubMed ID: 23382772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biophysical insight into mechanisms of sonoporation.
Helfield B; Chen X; Watkins SC; Villanueva FS
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Sep; 113(36):9983-8. PubMed ID: 27551081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasound and microbubble mediated therapeutic delivery: Underlying mechanisms and future outlook.
Chowdhury SM; Abou-Elkacem L; Lee T; Dahl J; Lutz AM
J Control Release; 2020 Oct; 326():75-90. PubMed ID: 32554041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species in Heterogeneously Sonoporated Cells by Microbubbles with Single-Pulse Ultrasound.
Jia C; Xu L; Han T; Cai P; Yu ACH; Qin P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 May; 44(5):1074-1085. PubMed ID: 29499918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Synchronized Optical and Acoustic Droplet Vaporization for Effective Sonoporation.
Liu WW; Huang SH; Li PC
Pharmaceutics; 2019 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 31197090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increasing the sonoporation efficiency of targeted polydisperse microbubble populations using chirp excitation.
McLaughlan J; Ingram N; Smith PR; Harput S; Coletta PL; Evans S; Freear S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Dec; 60(12):2511-20. PubMed ID: 24297017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An optical and acoustic investigation of microbubble cavitation in small channels under therapeutic ultrasound conditions.
Zhao X; Wright A; Goertz DE
Ultrason Sonochem; 2023 Feb; 93():106291. PubMed ID: 36640460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Acoustic cavitation-based monitoring of the reversibility and permeability of ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.
Sun T; Samiotaki G; Wang S; Acosta C; Chen CC; Konofagou EE
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9079-94. PubMed ID: 26562661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bubble size distribution in acoustic droplet vaporization via dissolution using an ultrasound wide-beam method.
Xu S; Zong Y; Li W; Zhang S; Wan M
Ultrason Sonochem; 2014 May; 21(3):975-83. PubMed ID: 24360840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ultrasound-microbubble mediated cavitation of plant cells: effects on morphology and viability.
Qin P; Xu L; Zhong W; Yu AC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 38(6):1085-96. PubMed ID: 22502880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dependence of sonoporation efficiency on microbubble size: An in vitro monodisperse microbubble study.
van Elburg B; Deprez J; van den Broek M; De Smedt SC; Versluis M; Lajoinie G; Lentacker I; Segers T
J Control Release; 2023 Nov; 363():747-755. PubMed ID: 37778466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identifying the inertial cavitation threshold and skull effects in a vessel phantom using focused ultrasound and microbubbles.
Tung YS; Choi JJ; Baseri B; Konofagou EE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 May; 36(5):840-52. PubMed ID: 20420973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Viability of endothelial cells after ultrasound-mediated sonoporation: Influence of targeting, oscillation, and displacement of microbubbles.
van Rooij T; Skachkov I; Beekers I; Lattwein KR; Voorneveld JD; Kokhuis TJA; Bera D; Luan Y; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Kooiman K
J Control Release; 2016 Sep; 238():197-211. PubMed ID: 27469471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interaction between cavitation microbubble and cell: A simulation of sonoporation using boundary element method (BEM).
Guo X; Cai C; Xu G; Yang Y; Tu J; Huang P; Zhang D
Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Nov; 39():863-871. PubMed ID: 28733016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.
Ammi AY; Cleveland RO; Mamou J; Wang GI; Bridal SL; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 16471439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation.
Hu Y; Wan JM; Yu AC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2393-405. PubMed ID: 24063956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mechanisms underlying sonoporation: Interaction between microbubbles and cells.
Yang Y; Li Q; Guo X; Tu J; Zhang D
Ultrason Sonochem; 2020 Oct; 67():105096. PubMed ID: 32278246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Time and Frequency Characteristics of Cavitation Activity Enhanced by Flowing Phase-Shift Nanodroplets and Lipid-Shelled Microbubbles During Focused Ultrasound Exposures.
Zhang S; Xu T; Cui Z; Shi W; Wu S; Zong Y; Niu G; He X; Wan M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):2118-2132. PubMed ID: 31151732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
