259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30639093)
1. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.
Potter S; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Williamson PR; Whisker L; Thrush S; Skillman J; Barnes NLP; Mylvaganam S; Teasdale E; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):254-266. PubMed ID: 30639093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.
Harvey KL; Sinai P; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Br J Surg; 2022 May; 109(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 35576373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery.
Riggio E; Toffoli E; Tartaglione C; Marano G; Biganzoli E
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):232-242. PubMed ID: 30497914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Calabrese C; Ribuffo D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-Based Reconstruction following Mastectomy in Patients Who Have Had a Previous Breast Augmentation: Lessons from the National Multicenter Implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation Study.
Baker BG; Sewart E; Harvey J; Potter S;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Feb; 149(2):324-337. PubMed ID: 35077406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.
Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
Bonomi S; Sala L; Gennaro M; Ricci C; Cortinovis U
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30247191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The iBRA-2 (immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy audit) study: protocol for a prospective national multicentre cohort study to evaluate the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the delivery of adjuvant therapy.
Dave R; O'Connell R; Rattay T; Tolkien Z; Barnes N; Skillman J; Williamson P; Conroy E; Gardiner M; Harnett A; O'Brien C; Blazeby J; Potter S; Holcombe C;
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012678. PubMed ID: 27855106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term reconstructive outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction with serious infectious or wound-healing complications.
Peled AW; Stover AC; Foster RD; McGrath MH; Hwang ES
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22421481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin-reducing mastectomy and one-stage implant reconstruction with a myodermal flap: a safe and effective technique in risk-reducing and therapeutic mastectomy.
Irwin GW; Black A; Refsum SE; McIntosh SA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23664385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
Chandarana M; Harries S;
BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adherence to best practice consensus guidelines for implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire survey.
Mylvaganam S; Conroy EJ; Williamson PR; Barnes NLP; Cutress RI; Gardiner MD; Jain A; Skillman JM; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Blazeby JM; Potter S; Holcombe C; ;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 44(5):708-716. PubMed ID: 29472041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire.
Mylvaganam S; Conroy E; Williamson PR; Barnes NLP; Cutress RI; Gardiner MD; Jain A; Skillman JM; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Blazeby JM; Potter S; Holcombe C; ;
Breast; 2017 Oct; 35():182-190. PubMed ID: 28768227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.
Parabkaharan S; Melody M; Trotta R; Lleshi A; Sun W; Smith PD; Khakpour N; Dayicioglu D
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76 Suppl 4():S332-5. PubMed ID: 27187252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction.
Potter S; Conroy EJ; Williamson PR; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Skillman JM; Barnes NL; Cutress RI; Teasdale EM; Mills N; Mylvaganam S; Branford OA; McEvoy K; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C;
Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2016; 2():41. PubMed ID: 27965859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction.
Ganesh Kumar N; Berlin NL; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Wilkins EG
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jan; 74(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 33172826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]