195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30639524)
1. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.
Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of Architectural Distortion Detected Only at Breast Tomosynthesis versus 2D Mammography.
Alshafeiy TI; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29584593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignant Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Choudhery S; Johnson MP; Larson NB; Anderson T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 32966111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis.
Phantana-Angkool A; Forster MR; Warren YE; Livasy CA; Sobel AH; Beasley LM; Trufan SJ; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Sarantou T; Voci AE; Sarma D; White RL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30242581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions.
Freer PE; Niell B; Rafferty EA
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 25575115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose.
Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E
Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography.
Linda A; Tarricone R; Londero V; Girometti R; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110075. PubMed ID: 34864616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography.
Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; López JE; Hernandez AM; Gazi P; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
Br J Radiol; 2019 May; 92(1097):20181034. PubMed ID: 30810339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Architectural distortion outcome: digital breast tomosynthesis-detected versus digital mammography-detected.
Ahmed SA; Samy M; Ali AM; Hassan RA
Radiol Med; 2022 Jan; 127(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 34665431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
