BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30639525)

  • 21. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
    Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Lillholm M; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Lynge E
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):111. PubMed ID: 31623646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The distribution and determinants of mammographic density measures in Western Australian aboriginal women.
    McLean K; Darcey E; Cadby G; Lund H; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson S; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 30819215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs.
    Boyd NF; Huszti E; Melnichouk O; Martin LJ; Hislop G; Chiarelli A; Yaffe MJ; Minkin S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):417. PubMed ID: 25346388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast density in screening mammography in Indian population - Is it different from western population?
    Singh T; Khandelwal N; Singla V; Kumar D; Gupta M; Singh G; Bal A
    Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):365-368. PubMed ID: 29139590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Childhood body mass index and adult mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.
    Hopper JL; Nguyen TL; Stone J; Aujard K; Matheson MC; Abramson MJ; Burgess JA; Walters EH; Dite GS; Bui M; Evans C; Makalic E; Schmidt DF; Ward G; Jenkins MA; Giles GG; Dharmage SC; Apicella C
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 156(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 26907766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
    Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of type of full-field digital image on mammographic density assessment and breast cancer risk estimation: a case-control study.
    Busana MC; Eng A; Denholm R; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 27670914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
    Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
    Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast Density of Mammography is Correlated with Reproductive Risk Factors Regardless of Menopausal Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Korean National Screening Program.
    Lee JS; Oh M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Apr; 21(4):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 32334463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical model for identifying the short-term risk of breast cancer.
    Eriksson M; Czene K; Pawitan Y; Leifland K; Darabi H; Hall P
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Mar; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 28288659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endometriosis and mammographic density measurements in the Nurses' Health Study II.
    Farland LV; Tamimi RM; Eliassen AH; Spiegelman D; Bertrand KA; Missmer SA
    Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1229-37. PubMed ID: 27549771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.
    Wanders JO; Holland K; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 28012087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.