These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30639686)

  • 1. The effects of warning characteristics on driver behavior in connected vehicles systems with missed warnings.
    Zhang Y; Wu C; Qiao C; Hou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():138-145. PubMed ID: 30639686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of collision warning characteristics on driving behaviors and safety in connected vehicle environments.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Huang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107053. PubMed ID: 37030178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
    Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():25-36. PubMed ID: 29885725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
    Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which accuracy levels of positioning technologies do drivers really need in connected vehicle settings for safety?
    Wu C; Zhang W; You X; Du N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106106. PubMed ID: 34016444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of lead time of verbal collision warning messages on driving behavior in connected vehicle settings.
    Wan J; Wu C; Zhang Y
    J Safety Res; 2016 Sep; 58():89-98. PubMed ID: 27620938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cooperative systems on driver behavior in heavy fog condition based on a driving simulator.
    Chang X; Li H; Qin L; Rong J; Lu Y; Chen X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():197-205. PubMed ID: 31054492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How does a collision warning system shape driver's brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking.
    Ruscio D; Ciceri MR; Biassoni F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():72-81. PubMed ID: 25700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance.
    Cummings ML; Kilgore RM; Wang E; Tijerina L; Kochhar DS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 18074708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of Vehicle Communication on Human Driving Reactions: A Simulator Study on Reaction Times and Behavior for Forensic Accident Analysis.
    Bauder M; Paula D; Pfeilschifter C; Petermeier F; Kubjatko T; Riener A; Schweiger HG
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 39065878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.