256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30640112)
1. A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran.
Arabameri A; Rezaei K; Cerdà A; Conoscenti C; Kalantari Z
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 660():443-458. PubMed ID: 30640112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prioritization of water erosion-prone sub-watersheds using three ensemble methods in Qareaghaj catchment, southern Iran.
Pourghasemi HR; Honarmandnejad F; Rezaei M; Tarazkar MH; Sadhasivam N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):37894-37917. PubMed ID: 33723776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon
Khosravi K; Pourghasemi HR; Chapi K; Bahri M
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Dec; 188(12):656. PubMed ID: 27826821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping flood susceptibility with PROMETHEE multi-criteria analysis method.
Plataridis K; Mallios Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jun; 31(28):41267-41289. PubMed ID: 38847951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: A comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models.
Ameri AA; Pourghasemi HR; Cerda A
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():1385-1400. PubMed ID: 29898506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.
Pathan AI; Girish Agnihotri P; Said S; Patel D
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(7):509. PubMed ID: 35713716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India.
Mitra R; Das J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):16036-16067. PubMed ID: 36180798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping in Shahroud plain, Iran. A comparison among statistical (bivariate and multivariate), data mining and MCDM approaches.
Arabameri A; Rezaei K; Cerda A; Lombardo L; Rodrigo-Comino J
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 658():160-177. PubMed ID: 30577015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Catchment-scale soil conservation: Using climate, vegetation, and topo-hydrological parameters to support decision making and implementation.
Borji M; Samani AN; Rashidi S; Tiefenbacher JP
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 712():136124. PubMed ID: 31931189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flood susceptibility mapping by best-worst and logistic regression methods in Mersin, Turkey.
Özay B; Orhan O
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):45151-45170. PubMed ID: 36702983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran.
Khosravi K; Pham BT; Chapi K; Shirzadi A; Shahabi H; Revhaug I; Prakash I; Tien Bui D
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():744-755. PubMed ID: 29426199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of geographical information system-based analytical hierarchy process modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of Krishna District in Andhra Pradesh.
Penki R; Basina SS; Tanniru SR
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(44):99062-99075. PubMed ID: 36087179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coastal Flood risk assessment using ensemble multi-criteria decision-making with machine learning approaches.
Asiri MM; Aldehim G; Alruwais N; Allafi R; Alzahrani I; Nouri AM; Assiri M; Ahmed NA
Environ Res; 2024 Mar; 245():118042. PubMed ID: 38160971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Urban flood susceptibility analysis of Saroor Nagar Watershed of India using Geomatics-based multi-criteria analysis framework.
Vaddiraju SC; Talari R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(49):107021-107040. PubMed ID: 36520296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel integrated modelling based on multiplicative long short-term memory (mLSTM) deep learning model and ensemble multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) models for mapping flood risk.
Mohammadifar A; Gholami H; Golzari S
J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118838. PubMed ID: 37595460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of hard and soft supervised machine learning for flood susceptibility mapping.
Andaryani S; Nourani V; Haghighi AT; Keesstra S
J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 291():112731. PubMed ID: 33962279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines.
Choubin B; Moradi E; Golshan M; Adamowski J; Sajedi-Hosseini F; Mosavi A
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 651(Pt 2):2087-2096. PubMed ID: 30321730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-hazard probability assessment and mapping in Iran.
Pourghasemi HR; Gayen A; Panahi M; Rezaie F; Blaschke T
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 692():556-571. PubMed ID: 31351297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms.
Razavi Termeh SV; Kornejady A; Pourghasemi HR; Keesstra S
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 615():438-451. PubMed ID: 28988080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of urban flood susceptibility through integrated Bivariate statistics and Geospatial technology.
Muthu K; Ramamoorthy S
Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):526. PubMed ID: 38722374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
