570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30640121)
1. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification versus conventional rapid freezing: Effects on motility, viability, morphology and cellular defects.
Le MT; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen TT; Nguyen VT; Nguyen TTA; Nguyen VQH; Cao NT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():14-20. PubMed ID: 30640121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method for native human sperm.
Aizpurua J; Medrano L; Enciso M; Sarasa J; Romero A; Fernández MA; Gómez-Torres MJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 28938751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved cryopreservation of spermatozoa using vitrification: comparison of cryoprotectants and a novel device for long-term storage.
O'Neill HC; Nikoloska M; Ho H; Doshi A; Maalouf W
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Aug; 36(8):1713-1720. PubMed ID: 31273587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large volume cryoprotectant-free vitrification: an alternative to conventional cryopreservation for human spermatozoa.
Slabbert M; du Plessis SS; Huyser C
Andrologia; 2015 Jun; 47(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 25040423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vitrification and conventional freezing methods in sperm cryopreservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li YX; Zhou L; Lv MQ; Ge P; Liu YC; Zhou DX
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():84-92. PubMed ID: 30580229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vapour fast freezing with low semen volumes can highly improve motility and viability or DNA quality of cryopreserved human spermatozoa.
Arciero V; Ammar O; Maggi M; Vignozzi L; Muratori M; Dabizzi S
Andrology; 2022 Sep; 10(6):1123-1133. PubMed ID: 35712876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification.
Rosato MP; Iaffaldano N
Theriogenology; 2013 Feb; 79(3):508-16. PubMed ID: 23218394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cryopreservation of Low Number of Human Spermatozoa; Which is Better: Vapor Phase or Direct Submerging in Liquid Nitrogen?
Hosseini A; Khalili MA; Talebi AR; Agha-Rahimi A; Ghasemi-Esmailabad S; Woodward B; Yari N
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2019 Jun; 22(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 29749276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Cryopreserved Human Sperm between Ultra Rapid Freezing and Slow Programmable Freezing: Effect on Motility, Morphology and DNA Integrity.
Tongdee P; Sukprasert M; Satirapod C; Wongkularb A; Choktanasiri W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 May; 98 Suppl 4():S33-42. PubMed ID: 26201132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vitrification is not superior to rapid freezing of normozoospermic spermatozoa: effects on sperm parameters, DNA fragmentation and hyaluronan binding.
Agha-Rahimi A; Khalili MA; Nabi A; Ashourzadeh S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 24444814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cryopreservation media differentially affect sperm motility, morphology and DNA integrity.
Raad G; Lteif L; Lahoud R; Azoury J; Azoury J; Tanios J; Hazzouri M; Azoury J
Andrology; 2018 Nov; 6(6):836-845. PubMed ID: 30105872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of cryopreserved human sperm from solid surface vitrification and standard vapor freezing method: on motility, morphology, vitality and DNA integrity.
Satirapod C; Treetampinich C; Weerakiet S; Wongkularb A; Rattanasiri S; Choktanasiri W
Andrologia; 2012 May; 44 Suppl 1():786-90. PubMed ID: 22211943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of repeated freezing and thawing on human sperm DNA fragmentation.
Thomson LK; Fleming SD; Barone K; Zieschang JA; Clark AM
Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar; 93(4):1147-56. PubMed ID: 19135665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis between slow freezing and ultra-rapid freezing for human sperm cryopreservation.
Riva NS; Ruhlmann C; Iaizzo RS; Marcial López CA; Martínez AG
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Nov; 22(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 30132630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and improvement of the novel method for vitrification of a few human sperms.
Li Y; Ma B; Yu P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():74-79. PubMed ID: 31234060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sperm preparation after freezing improves motile sperm count, motility, and viability in frozen-thawed sperm compared with sperm preparation before freezing-thawing process.
Palomar Rios A; Gascón A; Martínez JV; Balasch S; Molina Botella I
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Feb; 35(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 28990130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification.
Isachenko E; Isachenko V; Katkov II; Rahimi G; Schöndorf T; Mallmann P; Dessole S; Nawroth F
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 15016773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modern human sperm freezing: Effect on DNA, chromatin and acrosome integrity.
Rahiminia T; Hosseini A; Anvari M; Ghasemi-Esmailabad S; Talebi AR
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):472-476. PubMed ID: 28805603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An intrauterine insemination-ready cryopreservation method compared with sperm recovery after conventional freezing and post-thaw processing.
Larson JM; McKinney KA; Mixon BA; Burry KA; Wolf DP
Fertil Steril; 1997 Jul; 68(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 9207600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeated vitrification/warming of human sperm gives better results than repeated slow programmable freezing.
Vutyavanich T; Lattiwongsakorn W; Piromlertamorn W; Samchimchom S
Asian J Androl; 2012 Nov; 14(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 23064685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
