569 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30640121)
21. Cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa in large (up to 0.5 mL) volume: a novel technology.
Isachenko V; Maettner R; Petrunkina AM; Mallmann P; Rahimi G; Sterzik K; Sanchez R; Risopatron J; Damjanoski I; Isachenko E
Clin Lab; 2011; 57(9-10):643-50. PubMed ID: 22029178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Strategies to Minimize Various Stress-Related Freeze-Thaw Damages During Conventional Cryopreservation of Mammalian Spermatozoa.
Kumar A; Prasad JK; Srivastava N; Ghosh SK
Biopreserv Biobank; 2019 Dec; 17(6):603-612. PubMed ID: 31429586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa in new artificial seminal fluid.
Agha-Rahimi A; Khalili MA; Nottola SA; Miglietta S; Moradi A
Andrology; 2016 Nov; 4(6):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27566065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retained functional integrity of bull spermatozoa after double freezing and thawing using PureSperm density gradient centrifugation.
Maxwell WM; Parrilla I; Caballero I; Garcia E; Roca J; Martinez EA; Vazquez JM; Rath D
Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Oct; 42(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17845604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of freezing method, thawing temperature and post-thaw dilution/washing on motility (CASA) and morphology characteristics of high-quality human sperm.
Verheyen G; Pletincx I; Van Steirteghem A
Hum Reprod; 1993 Oct; 8(10):1678-84. PubMed ID: 8300827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does supplementation of sperm freezing/thawing media with Ceratonia siliqua improve detrimental effect of cryopreservation on sperm parameters and chromatin quality in normozoospermic specimens?
Faramarzi A; Aghaz F; Golestan Jahromi M; Bakhtiari M; Khazaei M
Cell Tissue Bank; 2019 Sep; 20(3):403-409. PubMed ID: 31313030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method.
Zhou D; Wang XM; Li RX; Wang YZ; Chao YC; Liu ZZ; Huang ZH; Nie HC; Zhu WB; Tan YQ; Fan LQ
Asian J Androl; 2021; 23(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 32567578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vitrification induces critical subcellular damages in ram spermatozoa.
Arando A; Delgado JV; Arrebola FA; León JM; Alcalá CJ; Pérez-Marín CC
Cryobiology; 2019 Apr; 87():52-59. PubMed ID: 30826334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Human sperm vitrification: the state of the art.
Tao Y; Sanger E; Saewu A; Leveille MC
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 32145746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Positive effect of progesterone on motility and velocity of fresh, vitrified without permeable cryoprotectants and frozen with permeable cryoprotectants human spermatozoa.
Saymé N; Dite L; Krebs T; Kljajić M; Maas DHA
Andrologia; 2018 Dec; 50(10):e13133. PubMed ID: 30225900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cryoprotectant-free ultra-rapid freezing of human spermatozoa in cryogenic vials.
Zhu J; Jin RT; Wu LM; Johansson L; Guo TH; Liu YS; Tong XH
Andrologia; 2014 Aug; 46(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 23822810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of cryoprotectant-free vitrification versus conventional freezing on human testicular sperm motility: a prospective comparative study.
Amer M; Ismail N; GamalEl Din SF; Rashad EZ; Fakhry E; Abd El Hakim W; Ragab A
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Dec; 24(5):389-394. PubMed ID: 31838927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cryoprotectants-Free Vitrification and Conventional Freezing of Human Spermatozoa: A Comparative Transcript Profiling.
Wang M; Todorov P; Wang W; Isachenko E; Rahimi G; Mallmann P; Isachenko V
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 35328464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new system of sperm cryopreservation: evaluation of survival, motility, DNA oxidation, and mitochondrial activity.
Pabón D; Meseguer M; Sevillano G; Cobo A; Romero JL; Remohí J; de Los Santos MJ
Andrology; 2019 May; 7(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 30916488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cryopreservation effects on canine sperm morphometric variables and ultrastructure: Comparison between vitrification and conventional freezing.
Cerdeira J; Sánchez-Calabuig MJ; Pérez-Gutiérrez JF; Hijon M; Castaño C; Santiago-Moreno J
Cryobiology; 2020 Aug; 95():164-170. PubMed ID: 32229272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does conventional freezing affect sperm DNA fragmentation?
Le MT; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen TT; Nguyen TV; Nguyen TAT; Nguyen QHV; Cao TN
Clin Exp Reprod Med; 2019 Jun; 46(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 31181874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in the structures of motile sperm subpopulations in dog spermatozoa after both cryopreservation and centrifugation on PureSperm(®) gradient.
Dorado J; Alcaráz L; Duarte N; Portero JM; Acha D; Hidalgo M
Anim Reprod Sci; 2011 May; 125(1-4):211-8. PubMed ID: 21530113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Motility, morphology and triple stain analysis of fresh, cooled and frozen-thawed stallion spermatozoa.
Brinsko SP; Van Wagner GS; Graham JK; Squires EL
J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2000; (56):111-20. PubMed ID: 20681122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conventional freezing vs. cryoprotectant-free vitrification of epididymal (MESA) and testicular (TESE) spermatozoa: Three live births.
Spis E; Bushkovskaia A; Isachenko E; Todorov P; Sanchez R; Skopets V; Isachenko V
Cryobiology; 2019 Oct; 90():100-102. PubMed ID: 31419408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dynamic assessment of human sperm DNA damage III: the effect of sperm freezing techniques.
Tvrdá E; Gosálvez J; Arroyo F; Sánchez P; de Jesús Risco Delgado R; Sánchez R
Cell Tissue Bank; 2021 Sep; 22(3):379-387. PubMed ID: 33201406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
