143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30640492)
1. What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination.
Podsakoff NP; Spoelma TM; Chawla N; Gabriel AS
J Appl Psychol; 2019 Jun; 104(6):727-754. PubMed ID: 30640492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of dominance analysis as a metric to assess relative importance: The joint impact of sampling error variance and measurement unreliability.
Braun MT; Converse PD; Oswald FL
J Appl Psychol; 2019 Apr; 104(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 30321030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling.
Schuurman NK; Hamaker EL
Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):70-91. PubMed ID: 30188157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling inter-individual differences in latent within-person variation: The confirmatory factor level variability model.
Nestler S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73(3):452-473. PubMed ID: 31912895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multilevel versus single-level factor analysis: Differentiating within-person and between-person variability using the CCAPS-34.
McAleavey AA; Castonguay LG; Hayes JA; Locke BD
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2020 Oct; 88(10):907-922. PubMed ID: 32584115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures.
Pustejovsky JE
Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):217-235. PubMed ID: 29911874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some guidelines for conducting research in applied behavioral pharmacology.
van Haaren F; Weeden M
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(2):498-506. PubMed ID: 24114163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 'paradox' of converging evidence.
Davis-Stober CP; Regenwetter M
Psychol Rev; 2019 Nov; 126(6):865-879. PubMed ID: 31414875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fixed versus random effects debate and how it relates to centering in multilevel modeling.
Hamaker EL; Muthén B
Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):365-379. PubMed ID: 31613118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beneath the surface: Unearthing within-person variability and mean relations with Bayesian mixed models.
Williams DR; Mulder J; Rouder JN; Rast P
Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 32437184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The fault is not in ourselves, but in our methods: comment on Schwarz.
Stam HJ
Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2010 Dec; 44(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 20821080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions.
Zhou H; Fishbach A
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Oct; 111(4):493-504. PubMed ID: 27295328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Supporting and enhancing scientific rigor.
Chen G
J Appl Psychol; 2018 Apr; 103(4):359-361. PubMed ID: 29658731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial.
Kozlowski SW
J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19186891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Studying Within-Person Variation and Within-Person Couplings in Intensive Longitudinal Data: Lessons Learned and to Be Learned.
Neubauer AB; Schmiedek F
Gerontology; 2020; 66(4):332-339. PubMed ID: 32526756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How within-person effects shape between-person differences: A multilevel structural equation modeling perspective.
Neubauer AB; Brose A; Schmiedek F
Psychol Methods; 2023 Oct; 28(5):1069-1086. PubMed ID: 35446047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conceptual and statistical issues in couples observational research: Rationale and methods for design decisions.
Baucom BRW; Leo K; Adamo C; Georgiou P; Baucom KJW
J Fam Psychol; 2017 Dec; 31(8):972-982. PubMed ID: 29309183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating reliabilities and correcting for sampling error in indices of within-person dynamics derived from intensive longitudinal data.
Schneider S; Junghaenel DU
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3872-3891. PubMed ID: 36261649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.
Rhemtulla M; van Bork R; Borsboom D
Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 31169371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
