153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30642222)
1. Association of Statewide Certificate of Need Regulations With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and Outcomes.
Chui PW; Parzynski CS; Ross JS; Desai NR; Gurm HS; Spertus JA; Seto AH; Ho V; Curtis JP
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Jan; 8(2):e010373. PubMed ID: 30642222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appropriateness of elective percutaneous coronary intervention and impact of government health insurance scheme - A tertiary centre experience from Western India.
Patil D; Lanjewar C; Vaggar G; Bhargava J; Sabnis G; Pahwa J; Phatarpekar A; Shah H; Kerkar P
Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(5):600-606. PubMed ID: 29054183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services.
Ho V; Ross JS; Nallamothu BK; Krumholz HM
Am Heart J; 2007 Oct; 154(4):767-75. PubMed ID: 17893007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From 2013 to 2015.
Hess PL; Kini V; Liu W; Roldan P; Autruong P; Grunwald GK; O'Donnell C; Doll JA; Ho PM; Bradley SM
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e203144. PubMed ID: 32315067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Certificate of Need (CON) for cardiac care: controversy over the contributions of CON.
Ho V; Ku-Goto MH; Jollis JG
Health Serv Res; 2009 Apr; 44(2 Pt 1):483-500. PubMed ID: 19207590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness: Insights From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program.
Bradley SM; Bohn CM; Malenka DJ; Graham MM; Bryson CL; McCabe JM; Curtis JP; Lambert-Kerzner A; Maynard C
Circulation; 2015 Jul; 132(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 26022910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the Healthcare Value of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Appropriateness, Outcomes, and Costs in Michigan Hospitals.
Alyesh DM; Seth M; Miller DC; Dupree JM; Syrjamaki J; Sukul D; Dixon S; Kerr EA; Gurm HS; Nallamothu BK
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e004328. PubMed ID: 29853465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States.
Thomas MP; Parzynski CS; Curtis JP; Seth M; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Patel MR; Bradley SM; Gurm HS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138251. PubMed ID: 26379053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. State deregulation and Medicare costs for acute cardiac care.
Ho V; Ku-Goto MH
Med Care Res Rev; 2013 Apr; 70(2):185-205. PubMed ID: 23035057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary impact of state certificate-of-need regulations for cardiac surgery: an analysis using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' National Cardiac Surgery Database.
DiSesa VJ; O'Brien SM; Welke KF; Beland SM; Haan CK; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Peterson ED
Circulation; 2006 Nov; 114(20):2122-9. PubMed ID: 17075012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Desai NR; Bradley SM; Parzynski CS; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Patel MR; Ader J; Soufer A; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP
JAMA; 2015 Nov; 314(19):2045-53. PubMed ID: 26551163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital-level percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
Bradley SM; Spertus JA; Kennedy KF; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Patel MR; Bryson CL; Malenka DJ; Rumsfeld JS
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1630-9. PubMed ID: 25156821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriateness and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Top-Ranked and Nonranked Hospitals in the United States.
Sukul D; Bhatt DL; Seth M; Zakroysky P; Wojdyla D; Rumsfeld JS; Wang T; Rao SV; Gurm HS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 11(4):342-350. PubMed ID: 29471947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Chinese Military Hospitals, 2011-2014: a retrospective observational study of a national registry.
Zhao R; Xu K; Li Y; Qiu M; Han Y;
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e023133. PubMed ID: 30361405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of a real-time appropriate use criteria decision support application for percutaneous coronary interventions in non-acute coronary syndrome.
Chen SH; Ho KK; Gannon SA; Thyagarajan B; Chakrabarti AK; Potter BJ; Singla A; Piccirillo BJ; Meduri CU; Cutlip DE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 88(3):E74-9. PubMed ID: 26699241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rate of percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease in the United States (2007 to 2011).
Kim LK; Feldman DN; Swaminathan RV; Minutello RM; Chanin J; Yang DC; Lee MK; Charitakis K; Shah A; Kaple RK; Bergman G; Singh H; Wong SC
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 114(7):1003-10. PubMed ID: 25118124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Certificate of need regulations and use of coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.
Popescu I; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Rosenthal GE
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(18):2141-7. PubMed ID: 16684984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).
Pandey A; McGuire DK; de Lemos JA; Das SR; Berry JD; Brilakis ES; Banerjee S; Marso SP; Barsness GW; Simon DN; Roe M; Goyal A; Kosiborod M; Amsterdam EA; Kumbhani DJ
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2016 May; 9(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 27166210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease: are they so different? Long-term outcomes in a contemporary PCI cohort.
Alcock RF; Yong AS; Ng AC; Chow V; Cheruvu C; Aliprandi-Costa B; Lowe HC; Kritharides L; Brieger DB
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Aug; 167(4):1343-6. PubMed ID: 22534045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Government Regulation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume, Access and Outcomes: Insights From the Washington State Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
Kataruka A; Maynard CC; Hira RS; Dean L; Dardas T; Gurm H; Brown J; Ring ME; Doll JA
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Sep; 11(17):e025607. PubMed ID: 36056726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
