These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30642286)
1. Optimal chemo-mobilization for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Song GY; Jung SH; Ahn SY; Jung SY; Yang DH; Ahn JS; Kim HJ; Lee JJ BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 30642286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. Chaudhary L; Awan F; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Tse W; Craig M; Hamadani M J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 23765597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies. Awan F; Kochuparambil ST; Falconer DE; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Deremer D; Jillella A; Craig M; Hamadani M Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Oct; 48(10):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23584435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma. Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies. Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vinorelbine plus intermediate dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and safe regimen for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Annunziata M; Celentano M; Pocali B; D'Amico MR; Palmieri S; Viola A; Copia C; Falco C; Del Vecchio L; Ferrara F Ann Hematol; 2006 Jun; 85(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 16538502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of engraftment following different stem cell mobilization modalities in patients with multiple myeloma treated with a uniform induction regimen containing bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Benyamini N; Avivi I; Dann EJ; Zuckerman T; Lavi N; Katz T Ann Hematol; 2017 Mar; 96(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 28013359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function. Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of etoposide combined with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma]. Wang GR; Yang GZ; Geng CY; Leng Y; Wu Y; Liu AJ; Chen WM Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Apr; 45(4):351-356. PubMed ID: 38951062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide + G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Bogucka-Fedorczuk A; Czyz A; Kalicińska E; Sawicki M; Laszkowska-Lewko M; Wicherska-Pawłowska K; Rybka J; Szeremet A; Prajs I; Szymczak D; Wróbel T J Clin Apher; 2020 Aug; 35(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 32298020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Optimization of mobilization regimes of blood hemopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma]. Pokrovskaia OS; Mendeleeva LP; Urnova ES; Gaponova TV; Gribanova EO; Alekseeva IV; Drokov MIu; Kalinin NN; Gretsov EM; Kliasova GA; Savchenko VG Ter Arkh; 2011; 83(7):50-7. PubMed ID: 21894752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed multiple myeloma patients: A subgroup analysis from the phase III trial ReLApsE. Baertsch MA; Schlenzka J; Lisenko K; Krzykalla J; Becker N; Weisel K; Noppeney R; Martin H; Lindemann HW; Haenel M; Nogai A; Scheid C; Salwender H; Fenk R; Graeven U; Reimer P; Schmidt-Hieber M; Goerner M; Schmidt-Wolf IGH; Klein S; Ho AD; Goldschmidt H; Wuchter P Eur J Haematol; 2017 Jul; 99(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 28370401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF]. Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis. Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Tuchman SA; Bacon WA; Huang LW; Long G; Rizzieri D; Horwitz M; Chute JP; Sullivan K; Morris Engemann A; Yopp A; Li Z; Corbet K; Chao N; Gasparetto C J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 25293363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of Plerixafor or Cyclophosphamide Combined with G-CSF in Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma]. Li WT; Ma LM; Lian Y; Wang QG; Gao ZJ; Zhao S Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 31(5):1403-1409. PubMed ID: 37846691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection efficacy is not an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation. Wang S; Nademanee A; Qian D; Dagis A; Park HS; Fridey J; Smith E; Snyder D; Somlo G; Stein A; Rosenthal J; Falk P; Kogut N; Palmer J; Gaal K; Kim Y; Bhatia R; Yuan S; Kay C; Weiss L; Forman S Transfusion; 2007 Dec; 47(12):2207-16. PubMed ID: 17714420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-dose etoposide is an effective and safe protocol for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Park Y; Kim DS; Jeon MJ; Lee BH; Yu ES; Kang KW; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Nam MH; Yoon SY; Choi CW; Kang ES; Cho D; Kim K; Kim BS; Kim DW; Kim SJ J Clin Apher; 2019 Oct; 34(5):579-588. PubMed ID: 31283042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]