BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30643002)

  • 1. Comparison of the Efficacy of Calculus Detection Between Ultrasonic Inserts and an Explorer.
    Partido BB; Webb C; Carr MP
    J Dent Hyg; 2018 Dec; 92(6):33-39. PubMed ID: 30643002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of calculus detection among dental hygienists using an explorer and ultrasonic insert.
    Partido BB; Webb CA; Carr MP
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2019 May; 17(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 30714331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculus detection calibration among dental hygiene faculty members utilizing dental endoscopy: a pilot study.
    Partido BB; Jones AA; English DL; Nguyen CA; Jacks ME
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Feb; 79(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 25640616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic vs. tactile evaluation of subgingival calculus.
    Osborn JB; Lenton PA; Lunos SA; Blue CM
    J Dent Hyg; 2014 Aug; 88(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 25295843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental Hygiene Faculty Calibration Using Two Accepted Standards for Calculus Detection: A Pilot Study.
    Santiago LJ; Freudenthal JJ; Peterson T; Bowen DM
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Aug; 80(8):975-82. PubMed ID: 27480709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasonic Instrumentation Instruction in Dental Hygiene Programs in the United States.
    Hinchman SS; Funk A; DeBiase C; Frere C
    J Dent Hyg; 2016 Apr; 90(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 27105792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative
    Rams TE; Manos MP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 34002702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing.
    Hunter RK; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1984 Dec; 55(12):697-703. PubMed ID: 6394737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A laboratory study to determine the effects of universal and rotating ultrasonic inserts on wrist movement and scaling time efficiency of dental hygienists.
    Hawn CC; Tolle SL; Darby M; Walker M
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2006 Feb; 4(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 16451435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
    Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical subgingival calculus detection with a smart ultrasonic device: a pilot study.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 35(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 18199147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental hygienists' perception of preparation and use for ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Asadoorian J; Botbyl D; Goulding MJ
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 Feb; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 25040431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental hygiene faculty calibration in the evaluation of calculus detection.
    Garland KV; Newell KJ
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Mar; 73(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 19289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of dental ultrasonic technologies on subgingival calculus removal: a pilot study.
    Silva LB; Hodges KO; Calley KH; Seikel JA
    J Dent Hyg; 2012; 86(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 22584452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrater agreement on subgingival calculus detection following scaling.
    Pippin DJ; Feil P
    J Dent Educ; 1992 May; 56(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 1629469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations.
    Patterson M; Eick JD; Eberhart AB; Gross K; Killoy WJ
    J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro calculus detection with a moved smart ultrasonic device.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 16441738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of two ultrasonic instruments on root surfaces.
    Woodruff HC; Levin MP; Brady JM
    J Periodontol; 1975 Feb; 46(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 1090720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.