BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30643067)

  • 41. Magnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation.
    Holzer B; Urban M; Hölbling N; Feil W; Novi G; Hruby W; Rosen HR; Schiessel R
    Surgery; 2003 Jun; 133(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 12796734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery.
    Rullier E; Denost Q; Vendrely V; Rullier A; Laurent C
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 May; 56(5):560-7. PubMed ID: 23575394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approach and multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery.
    Kuo LJ; Hung CS; Wang W; Tam KW; Lee HC; Liang HH; Chang YJ; Huang MT; Wei PL
    J Surg Res; 2013 Aug; 183(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 23465434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Laparoscopic transabdominal approach partial intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: surgical feasibility and intermediate-term outcome.
    Chi P; Huang SH; Lin HM; Lu XR; Huang Y; Jiang WZ; Xu ZB; Chen ZF; Sun YW; Ye DX
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):944-51. PubMed ID: 25245128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score.
    Hain E; Manceau G; Maggiori L; Mongin C; Prost À la Denise J; Panis Y
    Surgery; 2017 Apr; 161(4):1028-1039. PubMed ID: 27894710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Zhang YJ; Yin L; Huang L; Zhang HB; Han Y; Lin MB
    J Invest Surg; 2013 Aug; 26(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 23273177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Short-term efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open transabdominal intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
    Huang S; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Huang Y; Xu Z; Sun Y; Ye D; Wang X; Lin X
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 19(8):923-7. PubMed ID: 27545469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A Retrospective Study on the Feasibility of Completely Laparoscopic Transabdominal Approach Partial Intersphincteric Resection.
    Zheng H; Li Z; Zheng S; Li J; Zhao E
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Jun; 32(6):620-626. PubMed ID: 34492203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.
    Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Park IJ; Yoon YS
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26141090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS;
    Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].
    Xing J; Zhang C; Yang X; Wang H; Wang H; Yu E; Fu C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 28643312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for ultralow rectal cancer with transanal intersphincteric dissection as a first step: a single-surgeon experience.
    Maglio R; Meucci M; Muzi MG; Maglio M; Masoni L
    Am Surg; 2014 Jan; 80(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 24401508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perineal or Abdominal Approach First During Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Which Is the Best Strategy?
    Kanso F; Maggiori L; Debove C; Chau A; Ferron M; Panis Y
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):637-44. PubMed ID: 26200677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Yamada K; Ogata S; Saiki Y; Fukunaga M; Tsuji Y; Takano M
    Br J Surg; 2007 Oct; 94(10):1272-7. PubMed ID: 17671960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Laparoscope-assisted anal sphincter-preserving operation preceded by transanal procedure.
    Uchikoshi F; Nishida T; Ueshima S; Nakahara M; Matsuda H
    Tech Coloproctol; 2006 Mar; 10(1):5-9; discussion 9. PubMed ID: 16528490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prognostic factors for low rectal cancer patients undergoing intersphincteric resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
    Lee SY; Jo JS; Kim HJ; Kim CH; Kim YJ; Kim HR
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 111(8):1054-8. PubMed ID: 25977149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
    Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Schiessel R; Novi G; Holzer B; Rosen HR; Renner K; Hölbling N; Feil W; Urban M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Oct; 48(10):1858-65; discussion 1865-7. PubMed ID: 16086223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Kuo LJ; Ngu JC; Huang YJ; Lin YK; Chen CC; Tong YS; Huang SC; Hu CC; Tan SH
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4466-4471. PubMed ID: 28374259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Efficacy of intersphincteric resection in the sphincter-preserving operation for ultra-lower rectal cancer].
    Wang ZJ; Liang XB; Yang XQ; Yang B; Huang YT
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 9(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 16555146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.