BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30644379)

  • 1. Considerations and Rationale for Cochlear Implant Electrode Design - Past, Present and Future.
    Risi F
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):382-391. PubMed ID: 30644379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
    Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intracochlear Pressure Changes due to 2 Electrode Types: An Artificial Model Experiment.
    Mittmann P; Mittmann M; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):712-716. PubMed ID: 28025904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation.
    Ramos-Macias A; O'Leary S; Ramos-deMiguel A; Bester C; Falcon-González JC
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5S Suppl 1):S29-S37. PubMed ID: 31225820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis.
    Jwair S; Prins A; Wegner I; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Thomeer HGXM
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun; 131(6):1358-1368. PubMed ID: 33159469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear's unique electrode portfolio now and in the future.
    von Wallenberg E; Briggs R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S59-61. PubMed ID: 24869446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes.
    Garaycochea O; Manrique-Huarte R; Lazaro C; Huarte A; Prieto C; Alvarez de Linera-Alperi M; Manrique M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 277(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31637478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimizing Intracochlear Pressure: Influence of the Insertion Sheath.
    Ucta C; Mittmann P; Ernst A; Seidl R; Lauer G
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 33647910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing rehabilitation after subtotal cochleoectomy using a new, perimodiolar malleable cochlear implant electrode array: a preliminary report.
    Plontke SK; Fröhlich L; Cozma S; Koitschev A; Reimann K; Weiß R; Götze G; Seiwerth I; Kösling S; Rahne T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 278(2):353-362. PubMed ID: 32504199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The distance from the modiolus of perimodiolar electrode arrays of cochlear implants.
    Perényi Á; Nagy R; Dimák B; Csanády M; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2019 Aug; 160(31):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31352808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear structures after implantation of a perimodiolar electrode array.
    Richter B; Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Marangos N; Laszig R
    Laryngoscope; 2001 May; 111(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 11359162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.
    Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
    Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.