These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30645728)

  • 21. Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs.
    Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):109-120. PubMed ID: 28956154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Processing order in dual-task situations: The "first-come, first-served" principle and the impact of task order instructions.
    Strobach T; Hendrich E; Kübler S; Müller H; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1785-1803. PubMed ID: 29978280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.
    Klapp ST; Maslovat D; Jagacinski RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 29971643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1806-16. PubMed ID: 27311578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple processing limitations underlie multitasking costs.
    Lui KFH; Wong AC
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1946-1964. PubMed ID: 31073770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking.
    Fischer R; Fröber K; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():112-123. PubMed ID: 30245307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
    Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are participants' reports of their own reaction times reliable? Re-examining introspective limitations in active and passive dual-task paradigms.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():1-9. PubMed ID: 27825020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations.
    Hirsch P; Koch I; Karbach J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220150. PubMed ID: 31412048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: evidence for higher level task representations.
    Hirsch P; Nolden S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jul; 82(4):759-770. PubMed ID: 28285364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of peripheral information on a proactive process during multitasking.
    Kimura T; Kawashima T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1352-1362. PubMed ID: 37542429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks.
    Kübler S; Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 28856434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect monitoring in dual-task performance.
    Wirth R; Janczyk M; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):553-571. PubMed ID: 29094982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrophysiological evidence against parallel motor processing during multitasking.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Leuthold H; Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jan; 59(1):e13951. PubMed ID: 34628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multitasking as a choice: a perspective.
    Broeker L; Liepelt R; Poljac E; Künzell S; Ewolds H; de Oliveira RF; Raab M
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 29086021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.