These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30645728)

  • 41. Error modulates categorization of subsecond durations in multitasking contexts.
    Rafiezadeh M; Tashk A; Mafi F; Hosseinzadeh P; Sheibani V; Ghasemian S
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1253-1271. PubMed ID: 38492086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance.
    Janczyk M; Pfister R; Hommel B; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 24747873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dual route for subtask order control: Evidence from the psychological refractory paradigm.
    Luria R; Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):720-44. PubMed ID: 16707359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ideomotor compatibility enables automatic response selection.
    Maquestiaux F; Lyphout-Spitz M; Ruthruff E; Arexis M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):742-750. PubMed ID: 32323163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.
    Ruiz Fernández S; Leonhard T; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 21427007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():254-67. PubMed ID: 24956469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. More Than Hitting the Correct Key Quickly.
    Gaschler R; Zhao F; Röttger E; Panzer S; Haider H
    Exp Psychol; 2019 May; 66(3):207-220. PubMed ID: 31266432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex.
    Marois R; Larson JM; Chun MM; Shima D
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):436-47. PubMed ID: 16283409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments.
    Aufschnaiter S; Kiesel A; Thomaschke R
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):230-243. PubMed ID: 28741028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dissociating action-effect activation and effect-based response selection.
    Schwarz KA; Pfister R; Wirth R; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():16-24. PubMed ID: 29807302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex.
    Yildiz A; Beste C
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Nov; 220(6):3131-42. PubMed ID: 25017192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?
    Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study.
    Hesselmann G; Flandin G; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1608-21. PubMed ID: 21397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing.
    Schubert T; Strobach T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1884-1904. PubMed ID: 30335413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The role of the dorsal medial frontal cortex in central processing limitation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Soutschek A; Taylor PC; Schubert T
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2447-55. PubMed ID: 27083589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching.
    Hirsch P; Nolden S; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):569-580. PubMed ID: 28080113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Adaptive rescheduling of error monitoring in multitasking.
    Steinhauser R; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 232():117888. PubMed ID: 33647498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Renas S; Durst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):261-276. PubMed ID: 28557494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.