These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30646316)
1. Ethical Acceptability of Postrandomization Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Miller DG; Kim SYH; Li X; Dickert NW; Flory J; Runge CP; Relton C JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Dec; 1(8):e186149. PubMed ID: 30646316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pragmatic Randomized Trials Without Standard Informed Consent?: A National Survey. Nayak RK; Wendler D; Miller FG; Kim SY Ann Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 163(5):356-64. PubMed ID: 26215125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care. Dickert NW; Wendler D; Devireddy CM; Goldkind SF; Ko YA; Speight CD; Kim SY Clin Trials; 2018 Dec; 15(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 30280582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public preferences on written informed consent for low-risk pragmatic clinical trials in Spain. Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X; Wendler D Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Sep; 83(9):1921-1931. PubMed ID: 28419518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design. Kim SY; Flory J; Relton C Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 29224380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Who is willing to participate in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials without consent? Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 73(12):1557-1563. PubMed ID: 28900674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials. Taljaard M; Goldstein CE; Giraudeau B; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Hey SP; Brehaut JC; Jairath V; London AJ; Eldridge SM; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Weijer C Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 32367741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients' beliefs regarding informed consent for low-risk pragmatic trials. Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X; Wendler D BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):145. PubMed ID: 28923007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices. Kraft SA; Cho MK; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; Korngiebel D; James C; Kuwana E; Meyer A; Porter K; Diekema D; Capron AM; Alicic R; Wilfond BS; Magnus D Clin Trials; 2016 Oct; 13(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 27257125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders. Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Zwarenstein M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; McKenzie JE; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M; Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):765. PubMed ID: 31870433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Willingness to participate in pragmatic dialysis trials: the importance of physician decisional autonomy and consent approach. Courtright KR; Halpern SD; Joffe S; Ellenberg SS; Karlawish J; Madden V; Gabler NB; Szymanski S; Yadav KN; Dember LM Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29020994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brief Report: Staged-informed Consent in the Cohort Multiple Randomized Controlled Trial Design. Young-Afat DA; Verkooijen HA; van Gils CH; van der Velden JM; Burbach JP; Elias SG; van Delden JJ; Relton C; van Vulpen M; van der Graaf R Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 27035689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Approaches for Notification and Authorization in Pragmatic Clinical Research Evaluating Commonly Used Medical Practices. Weinfurt KP; Bollinger JM; Brelsford KM; Bresciani M; Lampron Z; Lin L; Topazian RJ; Sugarman J Med Care; 2017 Nov; 55(11):970-978. PubMed ID: 28650924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Streamlining the institutional review board process in pragmatic randomized clinical trials: challenges and lessons learned from the Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) trial. Marquis-Gravel G; Robertson H; Jones WS; Riley D; Ford DE; Crenshaw D; Joosten YA; Rudov L; Hernandez AF; Hess R Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):90. PubMed ID: 33494785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stakeholders' views on the ethical challenges of pragmatic trials investigating pharmaceutical drugs. Kalkman S; van Thiel GJ; Grobbee DE; Meinecke AK; Zuidgeest MG; van Delden JJ; Trials; 2016 Aug; 17(1):419. PubMed ID: 27550379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]