These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30646826)

  • 1. The relevance of the first two eye fixations for recognition memory processes.
    Schwedes C; Wentura D
    Memory; 2019 Jul; 27(6):792-806. PubMed ID: 30646826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manipulating the depth of processing reveals the relevance of second eye fixations for recollection but not familiarity.
    Schwedes C; Scherer D; Wentura D
    Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 31236764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3080-93. PubMed ID: 22902538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1971-89. PubMed ID: 21838656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of incidentally learned visual search arrays is supported by fixational eye movements.
    Annac E; Pointner M; Khader PH; Müller HJ; Zang X; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2147-2164. PubMed ID: 30883169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye spy a liar: assessing the utility of eye fixations and confidence judgments for detecting concealed recognition of faces, scenes and objects.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):38. PubMed ID: 32797306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.
    Ramey MM; Henderson JM; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Nov; 149(11):2046-2062. PubMed ID: 32250136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Taylor JR; Henson RN
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3027-40. PubMed ID: 22898644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Through the eyes to memory: Fixation durations as an early indirect index of concealed knowledge.
    Schwedes C; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1244-1258. PubMed ID: 27380497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Even if I showed you where you looked, remembering where you just looked is hard.
    Kok EM; Aizenman AM; Võ ML; Wolfe JM
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):2. PubMed ID: 28973112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priming of fixations during recognition of natural scenes.
    Valuch C; Becker SI; Ansorge U
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23444392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of encoding variability on rejection of non-corresponding lures: Role of retrieval processes.
    Rollins L; Parks N; Eakins R
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Apr; 110():103506. PubMed ID: 36989862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in forced-choice recognition memory: partitioning contributions of recollection and familiarity.
    Migo EM; Quamme JR; Holmes S; Bendell A; Norman KA; Mayes AR; Montaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2189-206. PubMed ID: 24796268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amount, not strength of recollection, drives hippocampal activity: A problem for apparent word familiarity-related hippocampal activation.
    Mayes AR; Montaldi D; Roper A; Migo EM; Gholipour T; Kafkas A
    Hippocampus; 2019 Jan; 29(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 30411437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking the truth: the effect of face familiarity on eye fixations during deception.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP; Vrij A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):930-943. PubMed ID: 27064964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The eyes remember it: oculography and pupillometry during recollection in three amnesic patients.
    Laeng B; Waterloo K; Johnsen SH; Bakke SJ; Låg T; Simonsen SS; Høgsaet J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1888-904. PubMed ID: 17958490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: an examination of individual differences.
    Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1154-64. PubMed ID: 22833341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye tracking evidence for the reinstatement of emotionally negative and neutral memories.
    Brooks PP; Guzman BA; Kensinger EA; Norman KA; Ritchey M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303755. PubMed ID: 38758747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory.
    Juola JF; Caballero-Sanz A; Muñoz-García AR; Botella J; Suero M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):855-876. PubMed ID: 30949925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The potency of people in pictures: evidence from sequences of eye fixations.
    Humphrey K; Underwood G
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):19. PubMed ID: 20884484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.