253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30647000)
1. Fracture resistance and 2-body wear of 3-dimensional-printed occlusal devices.
Lutz AM; Hampe R; Roos M; Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):166-172. PubMed ID: 30647000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-body wear of occlusal splint materials from subtractive computer-aided manufacturing and three-dimensional printing.
Schmeiser F; Baumert U; Stawarczyk B
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5857-5866. PubMed ID: 35612645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of occlusal splint materials: CAD-CAM versus conventional resins.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104813. PubMed ID: 34530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study.
Reymus M; Fabritius R; Keßler A; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):701-710. PubMed ID: 31127429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices.
Berli C; Thieringer FM; Sharma N; Müller JA; Dedem P; Fischer J; Rohr N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):780-786. PubMed ID: 31955837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of layer thickness and polishing on wear resistance of additively manufactured occlusal splints.
Diken Türksayar AA; Diker B
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105101. PubMed ID: 38801940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-body wear and surface hardness of occlusal splint materials.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S; Lassila L
Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):916-922. PubMed ID: 36288940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of material and antagonist type on the wear of occlusal devices with different compositions fabricated by using conventional, additive, and subtractive manufacturing.
Ateş G; Demirel M; Donmez MB; Dayan SÇ; Sülün T
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1235.e1-1235.e8. PubMed ID: 38594086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials.
Reyes-Sevilla M; Kuijs RH; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 45(7):539-544. PubMed ID: 29663496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of wear behaviour of various occlusal splint materials and manufacturing processes.
Grymak A; Waddell JN; Aarts JM; Ma S; Choi JJE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105053. PubMed ID: 34998068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wear Behavior of Occlusal Splint Materials Manufactured By Various Methods: A Systematic Review.
Grymak A; Aarts JM; Ma S; Waddell JN; Choi JJE
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):472-487. PubMed ID: 34516696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Three-unit Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Milled and 3D Printed Composite-based Materials.
Corbani K; Hardan L; Eid R; Skienhe H; Alharbi N; Ozcan M; Salameh Z
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Sep; 22(9):985-990. PubMed ID: 35000940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the effect of thermocycling on the mechanical properties of conventionally polymerized, CAD-CAM milled, and 3D-printed interim materials.
Taşın S; Ismatullaev A
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):173.e1-173.e8. PubMed ID: 34756771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture load of milled polymeric fixed dental prostheses as a function of connector cross-sectional areas.
Wimmer T; Ender A; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 24079564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of 3D printing system and post-curing atmosphere on micro- and nano-wear of additive-manufactured occlusal splint materials.
Wada J; Wada K; Garoushi S; Shinya A; Wakabayashi N; Iwamoto T; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105799. PubMed ID: 37028121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104254. PubMed ID: 33333480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of additively manufactured 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses after aging.
Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB; Olcay EO; Demirel M; Demir E
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104155. PubMed ID: 35526752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polymers for conventional, subtractive, and additive manufacturing of occlusal devices differ in hardness and flexural properties but not in wear resistance.
Wesemann C; Spies BC; Sterzenbach G; Beuer F; Kohal R; Wemken G; Krügel M; Pieralli S
Dent Mater; 2021 Mar; 37(3):432-442. PubMed ID: 33288324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material.
Mayer J; Stawarczyk B; Vogt K; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Reymus M
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Oct; 25(10):5987-5996. PubMed ID: 33811531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
