253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30647000)
21. Fracture analysis of CAD-CAM high-density polymers used for interim implant-supported fixed, cantilevered prostheses.
Yilmaz B; Alp G; Seidt J; Johnston WM; Vitter R; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 29310879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Wear and Fracture Resistance of 3D-Printed Denture Teeth: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
Gad MM; Alghamdi R; Al-Ghamdi R; Al-Jefri A; Akhtar S; Khan SQ; Alalawi H; Al-Qarni FD
J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35411606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study.
Borg H; Azer SS; El Hadary A; Helaly O; Shoeib A; Hassan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):743.e1-743.e6. PubMed ID: 37743141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A study of the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials and technologies for occlusal device fabrication.
Prpic V; Slacanin I; Schauperl Z; Catic A; Dulcic N; Cimic S
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):955-959. PubMed ID: 30711296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of flexible three-dimensionally printed occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Garoushi S; Vallittu P; Lassila L
Dent Mater; 2023 Oct; 39(10):957-963. PubMed ID: 37666693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dimensional changes of complete dentures fabricated by milled and printed techniques: An in vitro study.
Tsai FC; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):608-615. PubMed ID: 34364688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.
Stawarczyk B; Basler T; Ender A; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle C
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Wear resistance of 3D-printed denture tooth resin opposing zirconia and metal antagonists.
Cha HS; Park JM; Kim TH; Lee JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 31784192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 32444206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical and chemical characterization of contemporary occlusal splint materials fabricated with different methods: a systematic review.
Benli M; Al-Haj Husain N; Ozcan M
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7115-7141. PubMed ID: 37910242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique.
Peñate L; Basilio J; Roig M; Mercadé M
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 25935084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of CAD-CAM polymers for digitally fabricated complete dentures.
Perea-Lowery L; Minja IK; Lassila L; Ramakrishnaiah R; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):175-181. PubMed ID: 32063383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative Analysis between Conventional Acrylic, CAD/CAM Milled, and 3D CAD/CAM Printed Occlusal Splints.
Abad-Coronel C; Ruano Espinosa C; Ordóñez Palacios S; Paltán CA; Fajardo JI
Materials (Basel); 2023 Sep; 16(18):. PubMed ID: 37763547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Wear Resistance of 3D Printed and Prefabricated Denture Teeth Opposing Zirconia.
Pham DM; Gonzalez MD; Ontiveros JC; Kasper FK; Frey GN; Belles DM
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):804-810. PubMed ID: 33486808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The anisotropicity of the flexural properties of an occlusal device material processed by stereolithography.
Väyrynen VO; Tanner J; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 27312654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fibroblast behavior on conventionally processed, milled, and printed occlusal device materials with different surface treatments.
Bieger V; Thieringer FM; Fischer J; Rohr N
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):939-945. PubMed ID: 34598769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers.
Benli M; Eker Gümüş B; Kahraman Y; Gökçen-Rohlig B; Evlioğlu G; Huck O; Özcan M
Odontology; 2020 Apr; 108(2):240-250. PubMed ID: 31612354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually.
Rayyan MM; Aboushelib M; Sayed NM; Ibrahim A; Jimbo R
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):414-9. PubMed ID: 26001490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
