690 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30648363)
1. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
Dhingra V; Taneja S; Kumar M; Kumari M
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 23802641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro Evaluation and Comparison of Microleakage of Two Restorative Composite Resins in Class II Situations using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.
Nanda BD; Sharma P; Moudgil M; Sharma V; Gupta AK; Gupta D
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1100-1104. PubMed ID: 30287711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations with self-adhesive composite resin liners.
Doozandeh M; Shafiei F; Mohammadi F
Gen Dent; 2017; 65(4):41-47. PubMed ID: 28682281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of fiber inserts on gingival margin microleakage of Class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
Shafiei F; Doozandeh M; Karimi V
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):58-63. PubMed ID: 29714702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of Class I and II Composite Resin Restorations Using a Sonic-resin Placement System.
Kalmowicz J; Phebus JG; Owens BM; Johnson WW; King GT
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 26237636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill Composite Resins.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Saleh B; Nabih S
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016; 28(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 26892364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative evaluation of marginal microleakage of three different resins in Class V composite restorations].
Zhu Z; Zhu YQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2017 Jun; 26(3):241-245. PubMed ID: 29098237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Occlusal Loading on Gingival Microleakage of Bulk Fill Composites Compared with a Conventional Composite.
Hoseinifar R; Mofidi M; Malekhosseini N
J Dent (Shiraz); 2020 Jun; 21(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 32582822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities.
Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24147747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites.
Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):65-72. PubMed ID: 18997918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material.
McHugh LEJ; Politi I; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):e329-e335. PubMed ID: 28688735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing marginal microleakage of three Bulk Fill composites in Class II cavities using confocal microscope: An in vitro study.
Swapna MU; Koshy S; Kumar A; Nanjappa N; Benjamin S; Nainan MT
J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(5):409-13. PubMed ID: 26430307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
Bansal D; Mahajan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: Bonded-base and bulk-fill techniques.
Feiz A; Sajedi M; Jafari N; Swift EJ
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():89. PubMed ID: 34760080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
