These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30650144)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of genetically-modified crops: Part 1. Conditional difference testing with a given genetic background.
    Jiang C; Meng C; Schapaugh A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210747. PubMed ID: 30650144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalence tests for safety assessment of genetically modified crops using plant composition data.
    Engel J; van der Voet H
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2021 Oct; 156():112517. PubMed ID: 34411642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalence Testing Approaches in Genetically Modified Organism Risk Assessment.
    van der Voet H; Paoletti C
    J Agric Food Chem; 2019 Dec; 67(49):13506-13508. PubMed ID: 31725270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EFSA Genetically Engineered Crop Composition Equivalence Approach: Performance and Consistency.
    Herman RA; Huang E; Fast BJ; Walker C
    J Agric Food Chem; 2019 Apr; 67(14):4080-4088. PubMed ID: 30896940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative safety assessment of genetically modified crops: focus on equivalence with reference varieties could contribute to more efficient and effective field trials.
    Kleter GA; van der Voet H; Engel J; van der Berg JP
    Transgenic Res; 2023 Aug; 32(4):235-250. PubMed ID: 37213044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multivariate equivalence testing for food safety assessment.
    Leday GGR; Engel J; Vossen JH; de Vos RCH; van der Voet H
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2022 Dec; 170():113446. PubMed ID: 36191656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assuring the safety of genetically modified (GM) foods: the importance of an holistic, integrative approach.
    Cockburn A
    J Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 98(1):79-106. PubMed ID: 12126808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isoline use in crop composition studies with genetically modified crops under EFSA guidance - Short communication.
    Herman RA; Fast BJ; Mathesius C; Delaney B
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 95():204-206. PubMed ID: 29596977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the use of untargeted metabolomics in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops.
    Bedair M; Glenn KC
    Metabolomics; 2020 Oct; 16(10):111. PubMed ID: 33037482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops.
    König A; Cockburn A; Crevel RW; Debruyne E; Grafstroem R; Hammerling U; Kimber I; Knudsen I; Kuiper HA; Peijnenburg AA; Penninks AH; Poulsen M; Schauzu M; Wal JM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1047-88. PubMed ID: 15123382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety Assessment of Food and Feed from GM Crops in Europe: Evaluating EFSA's Alternative Framework for the Rat 90-day Feeding Study.
    Hong B; Du Y; Mukerji P; Roper JM; Appenzeller LM
    J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Jul; 65(27):5545-5560. PubMed ID: 28573861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview of genetically modified crop governance, issues and challenges in Malaysia.
    Andrew J; Ismail NW; Djama M
    J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Jan; 98(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 28898466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptation of the ToxRTool to Assess the Reliability of Toxicology Studies Conducted with Genetically Modified Crops and Implications for Future Safety Testing.
    Koch MS; DeSesso JM; Williams AL; Michalek S; Hammond B
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2016; 56(3):512-26. PubMed ID: 25208336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tempest in a tea pot: How did the public conversation on genetically modified crops drift so far from the facts?
    Goldstein DA
    J Med Toxicol; 2014 Jun; 10(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24798648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legislation governing genetically modified and genome-edited crops in Europe: the need for change.
    Halford NG
    J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Jan; 99(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 29952140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Europe should rethink its stance on GM crops.
    Heap B
    Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7455):409. PubMed ID: 23803807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GM plants for your health. The acceptance of GM crops in Europe might grow as soon as the first products to offer direct benefits for consumer health become available.
    Breithaupt H
    EMBO Rep; 2004 Nov; 5(11):1031-4. PubMed ID: 15520803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating biological variation in non-transgenic crops: executive summary from the ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute workshop, November 16-17, 2009, Paris, France.
    Doerrer N; Ladics G; McClain S; Herouet-Guicheney C; Poulsen LK; Privalle L; Stagg N
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3 Suppl):S2-7. PubMed ID: 20615445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.