330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30650161)
1. Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.
Pena AE; Rincon-Gonzalez L; Abbas JJ; Jung R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210956. PubMed ID: 30650161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrotactile Feedback Improves Grip Force Control and Enables Object Stiffness Recognition While Using a Myoelectric Hand.
Chai G; Wang H; Li G; Sheng X; Zhu X
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():1310-1320. PubMed ID: 35533165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tactile feedback is an effective instrument for the training of grasping with a prosthesis at low- and medium-force levels.
De Nunzio AM; Dosen S; Lemling S; Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Ge N; Graimann B; Falla D; Farina D
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2547-2559. PubMed ID: 28550423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control?
Ninu A; Dosen S; Muceli S; Rattay F; Dietl H; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24801625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm.
Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 29756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An exploration of grip force regulation with a low-impedance myoelectric prosthesis featuring referred haptic feedback.
Brown JD; Paek A; Syed M; O'Malley MK; Shewokis PA; Contreras-Vidal JL; Davis AJ; Gillespie RB
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Nov; 12():104. PubMed ID: 26602538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myoelectric Prosthesis Users Improve Performance Time and Accuracy Using Vibrotactile Feedback When Visual Feedback Is Disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 99(11):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 29935153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Control Architecture for Grasp Strength Regulation in Myocontrolled Robotic Hands Using Vibrotactile Feedback: Preliminary Results.
Meattini R; Biagiotti L; Palli G; De Gregorio D; Melchiorri C
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1272-1277. PubMed ID: 31374804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.
Wilke MA; Niethammer C; Meyer B; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 16(1):155. PubMed ID: 31823792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system.
Antfolk C; Balkenius C; Lundborg G; Rosén B; Sebelius F
Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Sep; 9():50. PubMed ID: 20840758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of calibration parameters on the control of a myoelectric hand prosthesis using EMG feedback.
Tchimino J; Markovic M; Dideriksen JL; Dosen S
J Neural Eng; 2021 Jun; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34082406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.
Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force.
Schweisfurth MA; Markovic M; Dosen S; Teich F; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056010. PubMed ID: 27547992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Optimal Vibrotactile Feedback for Force-Controlled Upper Limb Myoelectric Prostheses.
Gonzalez-Rodriguez A; Ramon JL; Morell V; Garcia GJ; Pomares J; Jara CA; Ubeda A
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 31795067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the effect of non-invasive force feedback on prosthetic grasp force modulation in participants with and without limb loss.
Barontini F; Van Straaten M; Catalano MG; Thoreson A; Lopez C; Lennon R; Bianchi M; Andrews K; Santello M; Bicchi A; Zhao K
PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285081. PubMed ID: 37141211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
