These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30650211)

  • 1. The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self-Driving Cars.
    Raue M; D'Ambrosio LA; Ward C; Lee C; Jacquillat C; Coughlin JF
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):358-374. PubMed ID: 30650211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.
    Liu P; Yang R; Xu Z
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):326-341. PubMed ID: 30059602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.
    Nordhoff S; Stapel J; He X; Gentner A; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260953. PubMed ID: 34932565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. sCARy! Risk Perceptions in Autonomous Driving: The Influence of Experience on Perceived Benefits and Barriers.
    Brell T; Philipsen R; Ziefle M
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):342-357. PubMed ID: 30239015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Should Autonomous Cars Drive? A Preference for Defaults in Moral Judgments Under Risk and Uncertainty.
    Meder B; Fleischhut N; Krumnau NC; Waldmann MR
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 30157299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptance of Full Driving Automation: Personally Owned and Shared-Use Concepts.
    Motamedi S; Wang P; Zhang T; Chan CY
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 31469591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Young drivers and their cars: Safe and sound or the perfect storm?
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Scott-Parker B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():18-28. PubMed ID: 29080470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.
    Teoh ER; Kidd DG
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():57-60. PubMed ID: 29203024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Machines versus humans: People's biased responses to traffic accidents involving self-driving vehicles.
    Liu P; Du Y; Xu Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():232-240. PubMed ID: 30798148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research on the use intention of potential designers of unmanned cars based on technology acceptance model.
    Huang T
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256570. PubMed ID: 34415950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should Manual Driving be (Eventually) Outlawed?
    Müller JF; Gogoll J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1549-1567. PubMed ID: 32026268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: Teen and parent impressions, perceived need, and intervention preferences.
    Weiss E; Fisher Thiel M; Sultana N; Hannan C; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S120-S124. PubMed ID: 29584476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.
    Verberne FM; Ham J; Midden CJ
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 23156624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-driving carsickness.
    Diels C; Bos JE
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():374-82. PubMed ID: 26446454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-Driving Cars and Engineering Ethics: The Need for a System Level Analysis.
    Borenstein J; Herkert JR; Miller KW
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):383-398. PubMed ID: 29134429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of teen driver fatality rates by vehicle type in the United States.
    Trowbridge MJ; McKay MP; Maio RF
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(10):850-5. PubMed ID: 17898248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: A national survey of teen and parent perceptions.
    Hannan C; Palumbo AJ; Fisher Thiel MC; Weiss E; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S84-S90. PubMed ID: 30335514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring Trust in Self-Driving Vehicles Through Text Analysis.
    Lee JD; Kolodge K
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):260-277. PubMed ID: 31502885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Special Series: Social Science of Automated Driving.
    Coughlin JF; Raue M; D'Ambrosio LA; Ward C; Lee C
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):293-294. PubMed ID: 30731034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.