237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30652385)
1. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between transvaginal mesh and pelvic floor reconstruction with native tissue repair in the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse].
Wu X; Wu F; Jiang J; Yang L; He WW; Li N; Zhang K; Chen L; Ren SF; Wu J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 58(8):595-602. PubMed ID: 37599257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.
Liu CK; Tsai CP; Chou MM; Shen PS; Chen GD; Hung YC; Hung MJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 25510700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prospective multi-center study in "Xiehe" pelvic floor reconstruction surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Sun ZJ; Zhu L; Lang JH; Hua KQ; Yang X; Han JS; Liang ZQ; Hu LN; Wang JL; Ma L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 46(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 22169511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Re-treatments of recurrence after pelvic floor repair surgery].
Fan SX; Wang FM; Lin LS; Song YF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):374-378. PubMed ID: 28647959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mesh-related complications in single-incision transvaginal mesh (TVM) and laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy (LASC).
Li YL; Chang YW; Yang TH; Wu LY; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 32039799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prospective study on total pelvic reconstruction surgery with Prosima in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse stage III].
Chen J; Zhu L; Lang JH; Shi HH; Lou WJ; Sun ZJ; Gong XM
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 47(9):664-8. PubMed ID: 23141288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current situation of complications related to reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a multicenter study.
Sun ZJ; Guo T; Wang XQ; Lang JH; Xu T; Zhu L
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2149-2157. PubMed ID: 34165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can the PFDI (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory) or PFIQ (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaires) be used to predict outcome in pelvic reconstructive surgery?
Letouzey V; Mercier G; Adjoussou S; Bohoussou E; Mares P; de Tayrac R
Prog Urol; 2013 Sep; 23(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 24010925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [LSC (LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY) VERSUS UPHOLD TYPE TVM: A CASE CONTROL STUDY].
Sato H; Teramoto S; Abe H; Mochida J; Takahashi S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 110(2):112-118. PubMed ID: 32307378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation on clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy].
Zhang XW; Xu L; Li YX; Gan YP; Chen LQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 24199920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes of modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective study.
Liang S; Zhu L; Song X; Xu T; Sun Z; Lang J
Menopause; 2016 Jul; 23(7):765-70. PubMed ID: 27138745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
