154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30652573)
1. Determining the Time of Cancer Recurrence Using Claims or Electronic Medical Record Data.
Uno H; Ritzwoller DP; Cronin AM; Carroll NM; Hornbrook MC; Hassett MJ
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2018 Dec; 2():1-10. PubMed ID: 30652573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development, Validation, and Dissemination of a Breast Cancer Recurrence Detection and Timing Informatics Algorithm.
Ritzwoller DP; Hassett MJ; Uno H; Cronin AM; Carroll NM; Hornbrook MC; Kushi LC
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Mar; 110(3):273-281. PubMed ID: 29873757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting Lung and Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Using Structured Clinical/Administrative Data to Enable Outcomes Research and Population Health Management.
Hassett MJ; Uno H; Cronin AM; Carroll NM; Hornbrook MC; Ritzwoller D
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e88-e98. PubMed ID: 29135771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Challenges and opportunities in measuring cancer recurrence in the United States.
Warren JL; Yabroff KR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Aug; 107(8):. PubMed ID: 25971299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Electronic Health Record-based Algorithm to Ascertain the Date of Second Breast Cancer Events.
Chubak J; Onega T; Zhu W; Buist DSM; Hubbard RA
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e81-e87. PubMed ID: 29135770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of metastatic cancer in claims data.
Nordstrom BL; Whyte JL; Stolar M; Mercaldi C; Kallich JD
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():21-8. PubMed ID: 22552976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Leveraging Linkage of Cohort Studies With Administrative Claims Data to Identify Individuals With Cancer.
Bronson MR; Kapadia NS; Austin AM; Wang Q; Feskanich D; Bynum JPW; Grodstein F; Tosteson ANA
Med Care; 2018 Dec; 56(12):e83-e89. PubMed ID: 29334524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of an algorithm that determines stroke diagnostic code accuracy in a Japanese hospital-based cancer registry using electronic medical records.
Gon Y; Kabata D; Yamamoto K; Shintani A; Todo K; Mochizuki H; Sakaguchi M
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):157. PubMed ID: 29202795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of algorithms using administrative health and structured electronic medical record data to determine breast and colorectal cancer recurrence in a Canadian province : Using algorithms to determine breast and colorectal cancer recurrence.
Lambert P; Pitz M; Singh H; Decker K
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jul; 21(1):763. PubMed ID: 34210266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a claims-based algorithm to identify colorectal cancer recurrence.
Deshpande AD; Schootman M; Mayer A
Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 25794767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying patients with asthma in primary care electronic medical record systems Chart analysis-based electronic algorithm validation study.
Xi N; Wallace R; Agarwal G; Chan D; Gershon A; Gupta S
Can Fam Physician; 2015 Oct; 61(10):e474-83. PubMed ID: 26759847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of claims-based algorithms for psoriatic arthritis.
Lee H; Ford JA; Jin Y; Cho SK; Santiago Ortiz AJ; Tong AY; Kim SC
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Apr; 29(4):404-408. PubMed ID: 31849154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.
Klabunde CN; Legler JM; Warren JL; Baldwin LM; Schrag D
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 17(8):584-90. PubMed ID: 17531502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The challenges of linking health insurer claims with electronic medical records.
West SL; Johnson W; Visscher W; Kluckman M; Qin Y; Larsen A
Health Informatics J; 2014 Mar; 20(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 24550563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study.
Fleming ST; Kimmick GG; Sabatino SA; Cress RD; Wu XC; Trentham-Dietz A; Huang B; Hwang W; Liff JM;
Ann Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 22(11):807-13. PubMed ID: 22948184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Medicare Claim-based Algorithm to Detect Breast, Prostate, or Lung Cancer Bone Metastases.
Sathiakumar N; Delzell E; Yun H; Jooste R; Godby K; Falkson C; Yong M; Kilgore ML
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e144-e149. PubMed ID: 29135778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A rule-based electronic phenotyping algorithm for detecting clinically relevant cardiovascular disease cases.
Esteban S; RodrÃguez Tablado M; Ricci RI; Terrasa S; Kopitowski K
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jul; 10(1):281. PubMed ID: 28705240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis using administrative or claims data.
Chung CP; Rohan P; Krishnaswami S; McPheeters ML
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K41-61. PubMed ID: 24331074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying veterans with acute strokes with high-specificity ICD-9 algorithm with VA automated records and Medicare claims data: a more complete picture.
Ried LD; Cameon R; Jia H; Findley K; Hinojosa MS; Wang X; Tueth MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 17943678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of electronic laboratory reports, administrative claims, and electronic health record data for acute viral hepatitis surveillance.
Allen-Dicker J; Klompas M
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2012; 18(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 22473112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
